Moreover, the language and framework of ACIM tend to be criticized for being very complicated and esoteric. The course's dense and repeated prose can be complicated to understand and read, resulting in distress and misinterpretation among readers. That complexity can make a buffer to entry, which makes it hard for persons to fully engage with and benefit from the course. Some critics fight that the complicated language is just a planned technique to unknown the lack of substantive content and to create an dream of profundity. The difficulty in comprehending the substance also can cause a dependence on outside teachers and interpreters, more perpetuating the commercialization and prospect of exploitation within the ACIM community.

Furthermore, the idea of forgiveness as presented in ACIM has been criticized to be very easy and perhaps dismissive of true hurt and injustice. The course advocates for a form of forgiveness that requires recognizing the illusory nature of the observed offense and letting go of grievances. While this process can be helpful in marketing inner peace and lowering personal putting acim lesson 1  up with, it might perhaps not sufficiently handle the difficulties of specific circumstances, such as abuse or systemic injustice. Critics fight this form of forgiveness can be seen as reducing the activities of subjects and absolving perpetrators of accountability. This will result in an application of spiritual bypassing, where people use spiritual methods to prevent dealing with painful emotions and hard realities.

The general worldview shown by ACIM, which emphasizes the illusory nature of the substance world and the ego, can be problematic. This perception may lead to an application of religious escapism, where people disengage from the bodily earth and its problems in support of an idealized religious reality. While this can give short-term reduction or perhaps a sense of transcendence, it may also result in a not enough diamond with crucial areas of living, such as associations, responsibilities, and social issues. Experts disagree that this disengagement could be detrimental to both the average person and society, as it encourages a form of passivity and neglect of real-world problems.

The exclusivity of ACIM is still another position of contention. The program usually presents itself as an excellent spiritual way, hinting that other religious or religious traditions are less legitimate or effective. That exclusivity can foster a feeling of spiritual elitism among adherents and build section as opposed to unity. Additionally, it limits the possibility of people to bring on a diverse array of spiritual assets and traditions in their personal growth and healing. Authorities fight that a more inclusive and integrative method of spirituality would be more helpful and less divisive.