A "course in miracles is false" is just a strong assertion that requires a strong dive to the statements, philosophy, and affect of A Class in Miracles (ACIM). ACIM, a religious self-study plan compiled by Helen Schucman in the 1970s, presents itself as a spiritual text that seeks to simply help people achieve inner peace and religious transformation through some classes and a comprehensive philosophical framework. Critics fight that ACIM's foundation, strategies, and answers are problematic and finally untrue. That critique usually revolves around many essential points: the dubious origins and authorship of the text, the problematic philosophical underpinnings, the emotional implications of its teachings, and the general usefulness of its practices.

The sources of ACIM are contentious. Helen Schucman, a scientific and research psychologist, said that the text was dictated to her by an interior style she identified as Jesus Christ. That claim is met with skepticism as it lacks empirical evidence and depends heavily on a course in miracles  Schucman's particular experience and subjective interpretation. Authorities fight that this undermines the standing of ACIM, because it is hard to substantiate the maintain of divine dictation. Furthermore, Schucman's professional history in psychology may have inspired this content of ACIM, mixing psychological concepts with spiritual a few ideas in a way that some discover questionable. The dependence about the same individual's experience increases considerations about the detachment and universality of the text.

Philosophically, ACIM is founded on a blend of Christian terminology and Eastern mysticism, showing a worldview that some fight is internally unpredictable and contradictory to conventional spiritual doctrines. For instance, ACIM posits that the material earth is definitely an dream and that true the reality is simply spiritual. That view may conflict with the scientific and sensible strategies of Western viewpoint, which stress the significance of the substance earth and human experience. Additionally, ACIM's reinterpretation of old-fashioned Religious concepts, such as sin and forgiveness, is seen as distorting primary Christian teachings. Critics argue this syncretism contributes to a dilution and misrepresentation of recognized spiritual beliefs, potentially leading followers astray from more coherent and traditionally seated spiritual paths.

Psychologically, the teachings of ACIM may be problematic. The program encourages an application of refusal of the material earth and particular knowledge, marketing the idea that individuals must transcend their bodily existence and concentration solely on spiritual realities. That perception may cause an application of cognitive dissonance, where persons battle to reconcile their lived experiences with the teachings of ACIM. Critics argue that this may result in psychological distress, as people may possibly experience pressured to ignore their emotions, feelings, and bodily sensations and only an abstract spiritual ideal. Moreover, ACIM's focus on the illusory character of enduring is seen as dismissive of genuine individual struggles and hardships, perhaps reducing the significance of handling real-world problems and injustices.