Who is Jesus Christ? Some people claim he was just a man, some individuals claim he was/is God, some claim he is really a icon created out of ancient Pagan fables, and the others ridiculously claim that Jesus never actually lived. So who's correct? Who was or who is Jesus Christ?

As a Religious, I believe that Jesus could be the Christ, the Son of the Residing Lord, and the Savior of Mankind. But, let's investigate the options having an open mind.

Was Jesus Christ merely a man, and nothing more? I believe not. Somebody who was only a man who went around expressing the things that he did will be regarded insane! Let's face reality here. We secure people up in psychological institutions nowadays when they make the type of claims about themselves that Jesus did. However, Jesus is the most Healthy Individual who actually lived! He gave number indications of emotional infection or instability at all! In fact, at age 12, he was therefore discovered and so clever he pleased the Jews in the Forehead in Jerusalem! If Jesus was merely a person, then by contemporary criteria, we ought to choose him as insane, and needless to say get shame upon his supporters as we'd the supporters of anyone who is clearly insane.

Is Jesus Christ only an amalgamation of ancient Pagan savior-gods? I think perhaps not! The Bible obviously indicates that Jesus Christ was a traditional person who wandered the countryside working wonders and providing people a cure for endless life. The "Pagan Christ" theory was popular in 19th Century biblical scholarship, but everyone else who understands any such thing understands that the idea is useless now. Just the absolute most generous of scholars allows the theory credence anymore, and that will inform us something. Those liberal scholars hate Lord, therefore obviously they will grasp at even the thinnest of straws if this means having a reason to keep to refuse Jesus Christ. The theory is lifeless, and let's leave it at that. Superficial characteristics involving the Lord Jesus and historical Pagan savior-gods doesn't necessarily mean such a thing at all. It's just a principle, and a bad one at that!

Did Jesus never actually live in history? Some really naive and ignorant persons actually get in to this theory, and they are scattering it via websites, publications, and DVD documentaries such as "The God Who Wasn't There" ;.What are we to consider this kind of theory and what're we to consider individuals who espouse that idea? What can we do? The only thing we are able to do is to counter these "Jesus Myth" individuals with facts from the Bible and pray for them. Lord knows their minds, and he knows why they hate Him, and only He can cure their wounds!

So, who is Jesus? Clearly, the only realistic and affordable realization we are able to achieve about Him, given the reality, is that He's just Who He said to be - GOD! Nothing otherwise makes sense! As we've seen, the theories of God-hating atheists and secularists just don't sound right and they don't fit the Biblical details!

In his book, Who Is Jesus Christ For Us Today, John Cone Ph.D., responses this issue using under consideration the active interplay between social context, Scripture, and tradition from the Dark perspective.

By the "cultural situation," Cone refers to the experience of Jesus Christ in our ordinary everyday existence. It is the ability of Christ in the social earth of injustice and oppression: an environment of top-dog and underdog. It's the knowledge of Jesus in the midst of life's absurdities that motivates one toward exploration of the Christological question, "Who is Jesus Christ for all of us nowadays?

Cone cautions against assuming however, that the meaning of Christ comes from or influenced by our social context. He insists that the Scriptures must be incorporated in to our complete comprehension of the truth of Jesus Christ. He thinks that that is vital because it provides people with trusted knowledge concerning the Jesus Christ we encounter within our cultural existence.

Convention, Cone declares, is "the connection that links Scripture with this modern situation." He sees the Dark spiritual tradition as representative of the Dark Church's affirmation of the mankind as well as affirmation of these belief at different junctions in history. That, he believes, offers the Dark Church of today with a further understanding of the truth of Jesus Christ.

In accordance with Cone then, cultural context, Scripture and custom sort the theological presuppositions upon which an analysis into this is of Christ must begin.

Who is Jesus Christ for people nowadays? Cone poignantly highlights that "Jesus is who He was." The historical Jesus was the truly human Jesus who was simply also a Jew. His humanness and His personality as a Jew are both applicable and very important to the affirmation of faith. Cone worries that Jesus was less a "universal" man, but He was a "particular" man; a particular Jew who stumbled on satisfy God's may to liberate the oppressed. Greens can relate to the old human Jesus because He stood as a mark of human putting up with and rejection. Jesus too, was unaccepted and rejected of men; Jesus too, was beaten and condemned, mistreated and misunderstood; Jesus also, suffered from an unjust cultural system where in fact the "small ones" were who is jesus . Blacks identified with the famous Christ since they believed He shared within their misery and struggles. Minus the humanness of traditional Jesus, Cone contends that "we have no schedule to contend that His coming bestows upon people the courage and the knowledge to battle against injustice and oppression."

Subsequently, Cone implies that "Jesus is who He is." What he seems to be saying is that who Jesus is today is intrinsically linked to who He was yesterday. His previous existence affirms His present fact that's experienced with the normal life. Therefore, Blacks believed, not only because of the validity and reliability of the famous Christ, but in addition because of their genuine experience of the Christ in their daily cultural existence. Christ in the current served and heightened them inside their battle for liberation in a oppressive society. The knowledge of Christ in the current allowed them to keep on preventing for justice even if chances were piled against them. Their view of a just cultural get was inseparable from their belief in God's liberating existence in Jesus Christ.

Finally, the meaning of Christ is taken further when Cone shows that "Jesus is who He'll be." He is "not just the Crucified and Risen Master, but also the Lord of the future who is coming again to fully consummate the liberation previously happening within our present." Dark hope, which appeared from an experience with Christ in the struggle for freedom, is the trust that Jesus will come again and identify divine justice. The eschatological hope within Black trust was not an opiate, but came to be out of battle within their present reality.

Finally, Cone asserts that "Jesus is Black." He is maybe not talking about a shade but circumstances or connection with oneness. He draws an analogy between Christ's traditional Jewishness and provide Blackness. Cone appears to be at the very least intimating that whilst the Jews were the opt plumped for for heavenly liberation ever sold, so can be Greens plumped for for liberation through Jesus in the present to be completely noticed in the future.