Furthermore, the language and structure of ACIM are often criticized to be excessively complex and esoteric. The course's dense and repeated prose can be difficult to know and interpret, leading to distress and misinterpretation among readers. This complexity can make a barrier to access, which makes it burdensome for people to completely engage with and take advantage of the course. Some authorities fight that the complicated language is really a purposeful method to hidden having less substantive material and to produce an dream of profundity. The issue in comprehending the product can also result in a dependence on external teachers and interpreters, further perpetuating the commercialization and possibility of exploitation within the ACIM community.

Also, the thought of forgiveness as shown in ACIM has been criticized to be overly simplified and possibly dismissive of david hoffmeister  actual harm and injustice. The class advocates for a form of forgiveness that involves realizing the illusory character of the perceived offense and letting go of grievances. While this method can be valuable in promoting inner peace and reducing personal enduring, it may not sufficiently address the difficulties of certain circumstances, such as abuse or systemic injustice. Experts argue this type of forgiveness is visible as minimizing the activities of victims and absolving perpetrators of accountability. This can result in an application of spiritual skipping, wherever individuals use religious ideas to prevent coping with painful emotions and difficult realities.

The general worldview presented by ACIM, which emphasizes the illusory character of the product earth and the ego, can also be problematic. This perspective may result in an application of spiritual escapism, where persons disengage from the bodily world and its challenges and only an idealized religious reality. While this may offer short-term comfort or a feeling of transcendence, additionally, it may result in a insufficient engagement with crucial areas of life, such as for instance relationships, responsibilities, and cultural issues. Critics disagree that disengagement could be detrimental to both the average person and society, as it advances an application of passivity and neglect of real-world problems.

The exclusivity of ACIM is another place of contention. The program frequently occurs as an exceptional religious way, implying that different religious or spiritual traditions are less legitimate or effective. This exclusivity may foster a feeling of spiritual elitism among adherents and create team rather than unity. Additionally it limits the potential for persons to pull on a diverse selection of religious sources and traditions inside their personal development and healing. Authorities disagree that the more inclusive and integrative method of spirituality could be more beneficial and less divisive.