Terry Francona better be right.The Cleveland Indians manager ideally put a lot of thought into his response to Tuesdays report from . He was hopefully as truthful as po sible when addre sing claims that Cleveland knew more about the lewd behavior of former pitching coach Mickey Callaway than it initially indicated, that team president Chris Antonetti lied when saying he never received complaints about Callaways conduct.Because when you respond to a story like that the way Francona did Tuesday, insisting that nobody with the Indians has ever deliberately covered up for anybody, you do so knowing that claim will be investigated further. You do so with the understanding that youll be held to such a statement if it turns out Brooks Robinson Jersey to be deceitful.After all, thats what brought us this latest report in the first place.When responding to s February 1 story on Callaway -- which featured multiple women detailing numerous unwanted advances from him -- Antonetti claimed no complaints had ever been raised about his former coachs behavior. In hearing this statement, multiple people who interacted with Callaway while he was in Cleveland reportedly reached Earl Weaver Jersey out to to call Antonettis bluff.Had he not said this, would we have learned about the incident with Callaway in 2017? The one that involved him sending "pornographic material" to a woman he was having an affair with? The one that was brought to Antonetti and Franconas attention by calls from the womans husband?Many fans responded to this story by highlighting the fact Callaways relationship with the woman was reportedly consensual, insisting this puts Cleveland in the clear.But the nature of the relationship isnt the concern here. The concern is Antonetti saying he never heard any complaints about Callaways behavior, only to have that claim deflated le s than a month later.Which brings us back to Francona.Scroll to ContinueIn responding to Tuesdays story, he opened his media se sion by first deciding now wasnt the right time to answer any questions about it. Only after pre sed further did he utter the above quote, the insistence that there have been no deliberate cover-ups within the organization.If thats the case, great. Francona has nothing Rio Ruiz Jersey to worry about. The truth is on his side.Again, though, hes answering questions about a story that surfaced primarily in response to a similar statement from Antonetti. If enough people were motivated to contact after hearing him say he never received complaints about Callaway, its not a leap to a sume the same could happen after the manager insists Cleveland never covered up for its former coach.Thats what makes Franconas response so risky. He was tasked with Jim Palmer Jersey discu sing a recent team claim that had just been debunked, and attempted to do so by offering a response that could potentially meet the same fate.The subject of these reports is a former member of his staff, one who was reportedly blatant in his unwanted pursuit of multiple women. In Cleveland, these women felt uncomfortable about the idea of reporting Callaways advances. They felt the only realistic response was to warn others about him, to give them a heads up about the Mickey treatment they may receive.These women are now coming forward, in part to stand up against the look-the-other-way nature Callaway was allowed to operate under for years. Knowing that, if theres any falsity behind Francona saying that Cleveland never tried to cover up Callaways conduct, it wont be long before we find out.So, once again, he better be right. There better not have been any additional knowledge of Callaways disgusting behavior before these stories came out. And there better not have been an attempt by the team to prevent it from coming to light.If there was, Franconas response to this story will only end up making it worse. For him, for Antonetti and for the entire organization Heston Kjerstad Jersey .Itll also further insult the women Callaway relentle sly pursued for years without consequence.