In a true free-market, such a organization manager would not survive, however, if you toss in crony capitalism or state-run capitalism, that will be nothing close to free-market capitalism then a powers that be protect the SOB and help him in making a monopoly or circumventing opposition, because event the statement might be valid. But we can't evaluate apples and oranges, and certainly in case of protectionism and crony capitalism, the business manager couldn't make it happen with no lawyers, laws, bureaucracy, rules, and his buddies in large places un-leveling the playing field and guaranteeing him an area in success lane.

It's needless to say, acknowledged that a business person could hope to construct a moat about his enterprize model, also Warren Buffet acknowledges that in his Documents, and invests running a business that have the regulatory benefit to help keep out opponents in a Motley Fools "Rule Breaker - Rule Maker" scenario. But whose fault can it be ultimately?

Policy manufacturers who let that to happen, why do they, since they're damaged and inviting up to the wealth in which to stay power. But, there's nothing incorrect with free-market capitalism, and success of the fittest is an intelligent choice for efficiency, and opposition, because it brings with all of it we are and all we've built - which explains why I really hope the "Occupy Protestors" freeze or begin decreasing on crony capitalism and maybe not free-market capitalism.

Socialism and Communism love to recapture the power of capitalism, they love capitalism, since they would like to get a handle on the circulation of sources, income, credit, and labor leading to economic enslavement, big gaps between courses, contrived shortages, and high-prices all detrimental to the person keeping them down, struggling to compete, or rise in socio-economic status for the value of the job, ideas, or production. That's criminal.