The practical program of ACIM's teachings is also a place of contention. Though some people report positive transformations and personal development from after the course, others get the techniques to be ineffective as well as harmful. The course's focus on forgiveness and enjoy is admirable, but critics disagree that it could be excessively simplistic and naïve, declining to deal with the difficulties of individual associations and the need for boundaries and accountability. Additionally, the course's period and extensive nature can be frustrating for a lot of people, resulting in burnout or disillusionment. Experts suggest that the full time and energy needed to complete ACIM could be greater spent on more empirically supported therapeutic techniques or religious disciplines which have an established track record of effectiveness.

The broader impact of ACIM on the religious and self-help neighborhoods can also be value considering. The program has inspired an important following and has been incorporated into various New Era and religious movements. But, their effect can be seen as a david hoffmeister  double-edged sword. On one hand, it's offered a construction for individuals seeking spiritual growth and inner peace. On one other hand, its teachings may contribute to a tradition of spiritual bypassing, where persons use religious methods to avoid dealing with particular and social issues. This can cause an application of escapism, where in fact the give attention to religious attitudes distracts from the necessity of interesting with and handling real-world challenges.

More over, the industrial accomplishment of ACIM and their related materials raises honest concerns. The proliferation of workshops, books, and seminars predicated on ACIM can be seen as capitalizing on individuals' religious needs and vulnerabilities. Critics disagree that the commercialization of spirituality can result in the exploitation of seekers, who might invest significant time and income in to techniques that fundamentally do not offer on their promises. This commercialization also can contribute to the dilution of the course's teachings, as different understandings and changes proliferate, possibly resulting in distress and misapplication of the principles.

Yet another critical part to consider may be the exclusivity and dogmatism that will often accompany the ACIM community. As the program itself advances general love and forgiveness, the way it's shown and practiced by some adherents can lead to a sense of religious elitism. This could build an "people versus them" attitude, where people who follow ACIM are regarded as enlightened, while those who do not are seen as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes could be divisive and counterproductive to the course's supposed goals of peace and unity. Critics fight that true spiritual growth should foster inclusivity and humility, as opposed to developing a hierarchical variation involving the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.