A "program in wonders is false" is a daring assertion that will require a deep plunge to the statements, viewpoint, and affect of A Program in Miracles (ACIM). ACIM, a religious self-study program compiled by Helen Schucman in the 1970s, presents itself as a spiritual text that seeks to simply help people achieve internal peace and spiritual change through a series of lessons and a comprehensive philosophical framework. Critics argue that ACIM's base, practices, and results are difficult and ultimately untrue. This critique often revolves about a few crucial factors: the doubtful roots and authorship of the writing, the difficult philosophical underpinnings, the mental implications of their teachings, and the general efficiency of their practices.

The roots of ACIM are contentious. Helen Schucman, a clinical and study psychologist, said that the writing was dictated to her by an interior style she identified as Jesus Christ. That claim is met with doubt because it lacks empirical evidence and relies greatly on Schucman's particular experience and subjective interpretation. Experts fight that this undermines the credibility of christian mysticism ACIM, because it is difficult to confirm the claim of heavenly dictation. More over, Schucman's skilled history in psychology might have influenced the content of ACIM, blending psychological methods with spiritual a few ideas in ways that some find questionable. The dependence about the same individual's knowledge raises problems in regards to the detachment and universality of the text.

Philosophically, ACIM is founded on a mixture of Christian terminology and Western mysticism, presenting a worldview that some argue is internally unpredictable and contradictory to old-fashioned religious doctrines. As an example, ACIM posits that the material earth is an impression and that true the reality is purely spiritual. That see may conflict with the empirical and reasonable methods of Western philosophy, which emphasize the importance of the product earth and individual experience. Furthermore, ACIM's reinterpretation of standard Religious concepts, such as for example failure and forgiveness, is seen as distorting key Religious teachings. Critics fight that syncretism results in a dilution and misunderstanding of established spiritual values, probably primary supporters astray from more coherent and historically seated religious paths.

Psychologically, the teachings of ACIM may be problematic. The program encourages a form of refusal of the substance world and particular knowledge, marketing the idea that persons must transcend their physical existence and emphasis only on religious realities. That perspective may cause a form of cognitive dissonance, wherever individuals struggle to reconcile their lived activities with the teachings of ACIM. Authorities disagree that can result in emotional distress, as people may sense pressured to ignore their thoughts, feelings, and bodily sensations in favor of an abstract religious ideal. Furthermore, ACIM's focus on the illusory nature of enduring can be seen as dismissive of authentic human struggles and hardships, possibly reducing the importance of addressing real-world problems and injustices.