The practical program of ACIM's teachings is also a spot of contention. While some persons record good transformations and personal development from following course, the others get the techniques to be useless or even harmful. The course's increased exposure of forgiveness and enjoy is admirable, but critics fight that it may be excessively easy and naïve, failing to address the complexities of human associations and the requirement for limits and accountability. Also, the course's period and intensive nature can be frustrating for some individuals, leading to burnout or disillusionment. Authorities suggest that enough time and effort required to complete ACIM could possibly be greater spent on more empirically reinforced beneficial methods or religious disciplines that have an established background of effectiveness.

The broader influence of ACIM on the religious and self-help neighborhoods can be price considering. The course has inspired a substantial following and has been incorporated into different New Era and spiritual movements. But, their effect can be seen as a double-edged sword. Using one give, it has offered a structure for individuals seeking religious growth and internal david hoffmeister  peace. On one other hand, their teachings can donate to a tradition of spiritual skipping, where people use religious concepts in order to avoid coping with particular and cultural issues. This can lead to a form of escapism, where in fact the focus on religious beliefs distracts from the necessity of participating with and approaching real-world challenges.

Moreover, the commercial success of ACIM and its related components raises ethical concerns. The growth of workshops, books, and seminars centered on ACIM can be seen as capitalizing on individuals' religious wants and vulnerabilities. Authorities disagree that the commercialization of spirituality may cause the exploitation of seekers, who may spend significant time and income into techniques that fundamentally don't supply on the promises. That commercialization may also subscribe to the dilution of the course's teachings, as various interpretations and adaptations proliferate, potentially ultimately causing confusion and misapplication of the principles.

Another critical part to think about may be the exclusivity and dogmatism that may sometimes accompany the ACIM community. While the class it self stimulates general love and forgiveness, the way in which it's taught and used by some adherents may result in a sense of spiritual elitism. This may build an "people versus them" attitude, wherever those that follow ACIM are viewed as enlightened, while those that do not are considered as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes could be divisive and detrimental to the course's purported objectives of peace and unity. Experts disagree that correct spiritual development should foster inclusivity and humility, as opposed to making a hierarchical distinction involving the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.