A positive RPL ACS skill assessment is the gateway to Australian immigration as an ICT professional. Therefore, you must write your RPL report in an excellent, concise, convincing and vivid way.
Having taken this fact into consideration, we have written this blog to familiarize you with the 5 common mistakes in writing an RPL report. In addition, we have also written about how to avoid these mistakes. So, read this whole blog to know the mistakes and how to avoid them for a successful ACS skill assessment.
5 common mistakes in writing an RPL ACS report:
You need to demonstrate your ICT skills, expertise and job history convincingly. The ANZSCO occupation post you are looking for must be compatible with all of these factors.
In other words, the content related to your job, responsibility and duty must be in harmony with the occupation you have chosen.
Before you write the report, you must read the job descriptions, duties and roles. You must know that a minimum of 65% of the information you provide must be related to the profession being considered. In the case of being less, the assessor will find your report not eligible due to lack of information. You will definitely face rejection. Therefore, offer job duties that are in harmony with your position.
Mistakes in choosing appropriate projects:
Your writing skills must be good enough to let you convey your job experience, skills and understanding of the project you have picked. ACS will assess your report with an eagle eye.
Your project must allow you to prove that you possess the necessary abilities and information. So, don’t make any haste when choosing projects. Remember that you have to present your job experience in a way that sounds like you are qualified and skilled enough to work as an ICT expert in Australia.
Partiality towards projects:
You shouldn’t make any bias when it comes to project descriptions or job specifications. Your reputation will be spoilt if you pay more attention to a certain project. Remember that every assignment you do is important to demonstrate your abilities and talents for an accurate evaluation.
Moreover, it will give the impression to the authorities that you think that you can only do what you like. If any tasks are assigned to you that you don’t enjoy, you will not give them your 100% attention.
Thus, it will work as an obstacle and hamper your progress. So, treat every assignment equally, which will sound like you can deal with any circumstance.
Deviating from the given guidelines:
Deviating from the ACS guidelines means setting the stage for rejection. ACS provides these guidelines for its convenience when it will check your report. Besides that, these guidelines will also help you write the report in a systematic way.
If you deviate from the given instructions, rules or guidelines, then a tremendous amount of confusion will come up. Thus, the authority will find your report complicated, which means it will be rejected.
Not hiring a professional ACS RPL report writer:
Writing an RPL report requires you to have excellent writing skills, advanced plagiarism detection tools, strategies to show competency convincingly and a huge amount of time for edits, checks and corrections. All these things a non-professional doesn’t have. Thus, even bright candidates face rejection when they write their reports on their own. On the other hand, sometimes, even average-level candidates attain positive assessments by hiring a professional. Thus, hiring an RPL ACS report writing expert is a must for a positive ACS skill evaluation.
If you need more information regarding ACS skill assessment, contact us without any hesitation.