In the case of RuneScape Gold Kinshra they were evicted from Falador as well as on the mountains. (I'm pretending there is an enormous mountain range that separates Asgarnia/Misthalin from Wilderness... It is odd to have one mountain all by it's own) Therefore, I'm guessing Daquarius the chief of Kinshra becomes a marquess.
He is the Lord of the title, which is logical. Why is Sir Amik considered a knight when Daquarius is Lord? What are your thoughts of this? Do you think a knight should be allowed to rule the kingdom? Sorry for the unrelated bits. I simply copied and pasted it from a blog post I had made on RSOF.
The grave situation is absurd to me. This argument states gravestones won't be blessed if people take your possessions. I don't see the problem, despite the fact that it was pre-2007 exactly the same but there wasn't a time limit of six minutes to pick your possessions.
One of the arguments is that the arrival of new bosses implies graves. Really? Tormented Demons, an updated boss, came out in 2008. As far as I know, even though my friend and I have a mutual blessing (he blesses but isn't yet dead), I can always return in three minutes. So, the whole gravestone blessing argumentment doesn't apply here. Whatever the blessings on your grave, you can still make it back.
The Corpreal Beast is the other. It was created specifically not to utilize the gravestone mechanism. Jagex should have looked at it and shamed the care bear bosses. Now you only have 2 minutes to go back to 2007 RS Items your stuff. It's impossible to leave the property prior to it becoming public loot.
English
Arabic
Français
Español
Português
Deutsch
Türkçe
Italiano
Russian
Romaian