MOA vs. MRAD: Which Reticle System Is Better for Long Range Shooting?

When it comes to long range shooting, one of the most debated topics among precision shooters is whether MOA (Minute of Angle) or MRAD (Milliradian) is the better reticle system. Both are angular measurements that help shooters adjust for bullet drop and windage, but their usability and preference often depend on the shooter’s background and application.

What’s the Difference?

MOA is an imperial-based system where 1 MOA equals roughly 1 inch at 100 yards. It’s often preferred by American hunters and shooters who are more familiar with the imperial system.

MRAD, or mils, is a metric-based system. 1 MRAD equals about 3.6 inches at 100 yards, making it more intuitive for those using meters and centimeters.

Pros and Cons

Feature	MOA	MRAD
Familiarity	Common in the U.S.	Widely used in military/tactical settings
Precision	Smaller adjustment increments	Slightly coarser increments
Conversion ease	Better for imperial range estimations	Better for metric range estimations

Which One Should You Choose?

Choose MOA if you're a hunter or recreational shooter working with yards and inches.

Choose MRAD if you’re involved in tactical, military, or competitive shooting where metrics dominate.

In the end, both systems are equally effective — what matters more is consistency. Pick the one that aligns with your measurement habits and stick to it.