The broader impact of ACIM on the religious and self-help communities is also value considering. The class has inspired a substantial subsequent and has been integrated into numerous New Age and religious movements. But, their effect is seen as a double-edged sword. Using one give, it's offered a framework for people seeking spiritual growth and internal peace. On the other give, its teachings may donate to a tradition of spiritual skipping, wherever individuals use spiritual methods to avoid coping with particular and social issues. This may result in an application of escapism, where in fact the concentrate on religious values distracts from the requisite of participating with and handling real-world challenges.

More over, the commercial accomplishment of ACIM and its related materials improves moral concerns. The growth of workshops, publications, and seminars predicated on ACIM can be seen as capitalizing on individuals' religious wants acim audio  and vulnerabilities. Experts argue that the commercialization of spirituality may result in the exploitation of seekers, who may invest significant time and money in to methods that eventually do not produce on their promises. That commercialization can also contribute to the dilution of the course's teachings, as different interpretations and changes proliferate, perhaps leading to distress and misapplication of the principles.

Another important aspect to take into account is the exclusivity and dogmatism that will occasionally accompany the ACIM community. Whilst the program itself promotes universal enjoy and forgiveness, the way in which it is taught and used by some adherents can lead to an expression of religious elitism. This will produce an "us versus them" mentality, wherever people who follow ACIM are seen as enlightened, while those who do not are seen as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes can be divisive and detrimental to the course's purported goals of peace and unity. Experts disagree that correct religious development should foster inclusivity and humility, as opposed to making a hierarchical difference involving the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.

The question of whether ACIM is "true" finally depends on one's criteria for truth. From the scientific perspective, having less scientific evidence promoting the claims of divine dictation and the course's metaphysical assertions may be reasons for skepticism. From the philosophical viewpoint, the internal inconsistencies and syncretism of ACIM can lead to questions about their coherence and logical validity. From the emotional perspective, the prospect of cognitive dissonance and psychological hardship raises problems in regards to the course's affect emotional health. And from a practical standpoint, the combined benefits described by practitioners and the potential for commercialization and exploitation declare that ACIM's effectiveness and ethical position are questionable.