More over, the language and design of ACIM tend to be criticized to be overly complex and esoteric. The course's thick and similar prose may be tough to understand and interpret, ultimately causing distress and misinterpretation among readers. That difficulty can make a barrier to access, making it problematic for people to completely engage with and take advantage of the course. Some critics argue that the complicated language is a purposeful technique to hidden the possible lack of substantive content and to produce an dream of profundity. The issue in comprehending the substance also can result in a reliance on external teachers and interpreters, more perpetuating the commercialization and possibility of exploitation within the ACIM community.

Additionally, the idea of forgiveness as shown in ACIM has been criticized for being overly basic and potentially dismissive of actual harm acim and injustice. The class advocates for a questionnaire of forgiveness that involves realizing the illusory nature of the perceived offense and making get of grievances. While this method could be helpful in promoting internal peace and reducing personal putting up with, it might perhaps not sufficiently address the difficulties of certain circumstances, such as punishment or endemic injustice. Experts fight that this kind of forgiveness is visible as reducing the activities of victims and absolving perpetrators of accountability. This could cause a questionnaire of spiritual bypassing, wherever individuals use spiritual concepts to avoid coping with unpleasant emotions and difficult realities.

The general worldview shown by ACIM, which stresses the illusory nature of the material earth and the vanity, can also be problematic. This perception may cause a form of spiritual escapism, where people disengage from the bodily earth and its difficulties and only an idealized religious reality. While this can give temporary relief or perhaps a sense of transcendence, it may also create a lack of involvement with important facets of life, such as associations, responsibilities, and social issues. Critics disagree this disengagement may be detrimental to equally the patient and society, since it promotes a form of passivity and neglect of real-world problems.

The exclusivity of ACIM is another position of contention. The class often occurs as an excellent religious route, hinting that other spiritual or religious traditions are less valid or effective. That exclusivity can foster a sense of religious elitism among adherents and develop team rather than unity. Additionally, it limits the possibility of people to bring on a varied array of spiritual assets and traditions within their particular growth and healing. Critics fight that a more inclusive and integrative approach to spirituality could be more beneficial and less divisive.