The industrial areas of ACIM also ask skepticism. Because their distribution, the program has spawned a multi-million dollar business that features books, workshops, seminars, and on line courses. Authorities argue that the commercialization of ACIM undermines their religious concept and raises ethical concerns concerning the motivations of those that promote it. The high prices associated with participating in ACIM-related activities may be high for most, resulting in accusations that the class is more centered on income than on genuine religious growth. This commercialization is visible as exploiting the spiritual needs and vulnerabilities of people for financial gain.

Furthermore, the language and structure of ACIM in many cases are criticized to be very complex and esoteric. The course's heavy and similar acim podcast prose could be complicated to comprehend and interpret, resulting in frustration and misinterpretation among readers. This complexity can make a buffer to access, which makes it burdensome for persons to fully engage with and benefit from the course. Some authorities fight that the complicated language is really a planned technique to hidden the possible lack of substantive material and to generate an dream of profundity. The difficulty in comprehending the material may also lead to a dependence on outside educators and interpreters, more perpetuating the commercialization and possibility of exploitation within the ACIM community.

Also, the notion of forgiveness as shown in ACIM has been criticized to be overly basic and possibly dismissive of actual harm and injustice. The class advocates for an application of forgiveness that involves recognizing the illusory character of the observed offense and letting move of grievances. While this approach may be beneficial in marketing internal peace and reducing personal enduring, it could not acceptably handle the complexities of particular scenarios, such as for example abuse or systemic injustice. Critics fight that this type of forgiveness is visible as minimizing the activities of patients and absolving perpetrators of accountability. This could lead to a questionnaire of spiritual skipping, where individuals use religious ideas in order to avoid working with painful emotions and difficult realities.

The overall worldview presented by ACIM, which stresses the illusory character of the substance earth and the pride, may also be problematic. That perspective may result in an application of spiritual escapism, where persons disengage from the physical world and their issues and only an idealized religious reality. While this can give short-term aid or a sense of transcendence, additionally, it may result in a insufficient diamond with crucial aspects of living, such as relationships, responsibilities, and cultural issues. Experts argue that this disengagement could be detrimental to equally the average person and society, as it advances a questionnaire of passivity and neglect of real-world problems.