Moreover, the language and design of ACIM in many cases are criticized for being overly complex and esoteric. The course's dense and similar prose may be difficult to understand and interpret, resulting in frustration and misinterpretation among readers. That difficulty can make a buffer to access, which makes it problematic for people to completely interact with and take advantage of the course. Some experts fight that the complicated language is just a planned technique to unknown having less substantive material and to generate an impression of profundity. The issue in comprehending the material can also cause a dependence on additional teachers and interpreters, further perpetuating the commercialization and prospect of exploitation within the ACIM community.

Moreover, the thought of forgiveness as presented in ACIM has been criticized to be very easy and possibly dismissive of real hurt and a course in miracles podcast injustice. The course advocates for an application of forgiveness that requires knowing the illusory nature of the perceived offense and letting get of grievances. While this approach can be useful in promoting inner peace and reducing particular suffering, it may perhaps not acceptably address the difficulties of specific situations, such as for instance abuse or systemic injustice. Experts fight that this form of forgiveness can be seen as reducing the activities of subjects and absolving perpetrators of accountability. This could lead to an application of spiritual bypassing, wherever individuals use spiritual methods to prevent coping with uncomfortable emotions and hard realities.

The general worldview presented by ACIM, which stresses the illusory character of the substance world and the pride, can be problematic. That perception can result in a form of religious escapism, wherever persons disengage from the physical earth and its problems in support of an idealized spiritual reality. While this may give temporary comfort or even a feeling of transcendence, it can also create a insufficient diamond with crucial aspects of life, such as associations, responsibilities, and social issues. Critics fight that this disengagement may be detrimental to both the patient and society, because it promotes a form of passivity and neglect of real-world problems.

The exclusivity of ACIM is still another place of contention. The program often occurs as an excellent spiritual course, hinting that different spiritual or spiritual traditions are less valid or effective. That exclusivity can foster a sense of religious elitism among adherents and create section as opposed to unity. In addition, it limits the possibility of persons to bring on a diverse range of spiritual sources and traditions in their particular development and healing. Experts disagree that the more inclusive and integrative way of spirituality will be more useful and less divisive.