From the psychological point of view, the origins of ACIM raise issues about its validity. Helen Schucman, the primary scribe of the text, claimed that the language were determined to her by an internal style she recognized as Jesus. This method of obtaining the writing through internal dictation, known as channeling, is frequently met with skepticism. Critics disagree that channeling may be understood as a mental sensation rather than true religious revelation. Schucman herself was a medical psychiatrist, and some suggest that the style she heard may have been a manifestation of her subconscious mind as opposed to an additional divine entity. Furthermore, Schucman stated ambivalence about the job and their sources, often wondering their reliability herself. That ambivalence, in conjunction with the method of the text's party, portrays uncertainty on the legitimacy of ACIM as a divinely influenced scripture.

The information of ACIM also encourages scrutiny from a philosophical angle. The course shows that the entire world we comprehend with your senses is an dream and which our correct fact lies beyond this bodily realm. That idealistic view, which echoes specific Western philosophies, problems the materialistic  david hoffmeiste and empirical foundations of American thought. Authorities disagree that the claim that the physical earth can be an impression is not substantiated by scientific evidence and goes counter to the medical strategy, which relies on observable and measurable phenomena. The idea of an illusory world may be engaging as a metaphor for the disturbances of belief brought on by the confidence, but as a literal assertion, it lacks the empirical support needed to be described as a legitimate illustration of reality.

Furthermore, the sensible software of ACIM's teachings may be problematic. The program advocates for a revolutionary form of forgiveness, suggesting that all issues are illusions and ought to be neglected in favor of recognizing the inherent unity of most beings. Whilst the practice of forgiveness can indeed be healing and major, ACIM's strategy may possibly cause individuals to suppress respectable emotions and ignore true injustices. By surrounding all bad experiences as illusions produced by the vanity, there is a danger of minimizing or invalidating the lived experiences of enduring and trauma. This perception could be especially harmful for individuals working with significant dilemmas such as punishment or oppression, as it may decrease them from seeking the required support and interventions.

Yet another point of argument is the way in which ACIM has been marketed and commercialized. Since its distribution, ACIM has spawned an important business of workshops, seminars, and supplementary materials. Authorities disagree this commercialization undermines the spiritual integrity of the teachings, turning what is supposed to be a sacred text in to a profit-driven enterprise. The expansion of ACIM-related items and solutions has light emitting diode some to question the motivations behind their promotion and the authenticity of those who claim to show their principles. This industrial aspect can cause a buffer to real spiritual exploration, as individuals may possibly become more dedicated to purchasing another guide or joining the next workshop rather than participating deeply with the teachings themselves.