A "program in miracles is false" is really a striking assertion that will require a heavy dive to the claims, idea, and influence of A Course in Wonders (ACIM). ACIM, a spiritual self-study plan published by Helen Schucman in the 1970s, occurs as a spiritual text that aims to simply help people obtain internal peace and religious change through some classes and an extensive philosophical framework. Critics disagree that ACIM's foundation, techniques, and answers are difficult and eventually untrue. That critique frequently revolves around several important points: the questionable sources and authorship of the writing, the problematic philosophical underpinnings, the emotional implications of their teachings, and the overall effectiveness of its practices.

The sources of ACIM are contentious. Helen Schucman, a medical and research psychiatrist, stated that the writing was determined to her by an inner voice she recognized as Jesus Christ. That maintain is achieved with doubt since it lacks the mystical teachings of Jesus empirical evidence and relies heavily on Schucman's particular experience and subjective interpretation. Experts argue this undermines the credibility of ACIM, since it is hard to substantiate the claim of heavenly dictation. Furthermore, Schucman's professional background in psychology could have inspired the content of ACIM, mixing mental ideas with religious a few ideas in a way that some find questionable. The dependence on a single individual's knowledge increases issues in regards to the detachment and universality of the text.

Philosophically, ACIM is founded on a mixture of Religious terminology and Western mysticism, introducing a worldview that some argue is internally inconsistent and contradictory to traditional spiritual doctrines. As an example, ACIM posits that the substance earth can be an dream and that correct reality is simply spiritual. This view may struggle with the empirical and sensible strategies of American philosophy, which stress the significance of the product earth and human experience. More over, ACIM's reinterpretation of conventional Religious ideas, such as crime and forgiveness, can be seen as distorting core Christian teachings. Experts fight that syncretism leads to a dilution and misunderstanding of established spiritual values, possibly leading supporters astray from more coherent and historically grounded religious paths.

Psychologically, the teachings of ACIM could be problematic. The class encourages an application of rejection of the product earth and particular experience, marketing the proven fact that people must surpass their bodily living and concentration only on religious realities. That perspective may cause an application of cognitive dissonance, where persons struggle to reconcile their existed activities with the teachings of ACIM. Critics disagree that this may result in emotional distress, as people may possibly experience pressured to ignore their emotions, thoughts, and physical sensations in support of an abstract religious ideal. Additionally, ACIM's focus on the illusory character of enduring is visible as dismissive of true human problems and hardships, possibly reducing the significance of addressing real-world problems and injustices.