More over, the information of ACIM diverges somewhat from standard Christian teachings, despite their regular sources to Christian terminology and concepts. The program reinterprets essential aspects of Christianity, like the character of sin, salvation, and the position of Jesus Christ. As an example, ACIM shows that failure is not true and that salvation is reached by way of a modify in belief as opposed to through the atoning lose of Jesus. That reinterpretation can be seen as problematic for people who stick to orthodox Christian values, as it fundamentally alters the core tenets of their faith. The divergence from conventional doctrine has led several Religious scholars to dismiss ACIM as heretical or misleading.

The psychological influence of ACIM on its adherents is still another section of concern. As the class claims internal peace and religious enlightenment, some mental health professionals have elevated sensors about their potential to cause confusion, disillusionment, and actually emotional harm. The course's focus on the illusory character of the material world and the pride acim  may cause persons to problem the truth of the activities and thoughts in techniques may possibly not be beneficial. For many, this asking can lead to a diminished capacity to deal with real-world issues and associations, resulting in solitude and an expression of detachment from life. Experts argue that this kind of strategy could be particularly dangerous for people that are already vulnerable or fighting psychological wellness issues.

Another stage of review is having less empirical support for the statements produced by ACIM. The class asserts that its teachings can lead to profound religious change and healing, but these statements are not reinforced by clinical study or clinical studies. Without scientific evidence to straight back up their assertions, ACIM relies heavily on anecdotal evidence and particular testimonials, which are inherently subjective and unreliable. The possible lack of rigorous, aim research makes it difficult to confirm the true efficiency of the class and improves questions about their overall legitimacy.

The industrial facets of ACIM also ask skepticism. Since their publication, the class has spawned a multi-million dollar market that features publications, workshops, seminars, and on line courses. Critics fight that the commercialization of ACIM undermines their religious message and improves ethical considerations about the motivations of those that promote it. The high expenses related to participating in ACIM-related actions can be high for most, leading to accusations that the program is more dedicated to revenue than on authentic religious growth. That commercialization is visible as exploiting the religious needs and vulnerabilities of people for financial gain.

Moreover, the language and design of ACIM tend to be criticized to be overly complicated and esoteric. The course's dense and similar prose can be challenging to understand and interpret, leading to frustration and misinterpretation among readers. That complexity can produce a barrier to entry, making it problematic for persons to completely engage with and take advantage of the course. Some critics fight that the complicated language is just a planned approach to hidden the possible lack of substantive material and to produce an illusion of profundity. The issue in comprehending the material also can cause a reliance on additional educators and interpreters, further perpetuating the commercialization and prospect of exploitation within the ACIM community.