The sensible program of ACIM's teachings can be a point of contention. Though some people record positive transformations and personal growth from following the class, the others get the methods to be inadequate or even harmful. The course's focus on forgiveness and enjoy is admirable, but critics argue that it could be excessively easy and naïve, declining to deal with the difficulties of human associations and the requirement for limits and accountability. Additionally, the course's length and intensive character may be overwhelming for some people, leading to burnout or disillusionment. Authorities claim that the time and energy needed to perform ACIM could be better spent on more empirically supported beneficial methods or spiritual disciplines which have a proven track record of effectiveness.

The broader affect of ACIM on the religious and self-help areas can also be worth considering. The program has encouraged a significant subsequent and has been built-into various New Era and spiritual movements. But, its impact is visible as a double-edged sword. On a single give, it has offered a platform for individuals seeking religious development and internal peace. On  david hoffmeister the other hand, its teachings can subscribe to a lifestyle of spiritual bypassing, wherever people use spiritual concepts to avoid working with personal and social issues. This will cause a questionnaire of escapism, where in actuality the concentrate on religious values distracts from the requisite of participating with and addressing real-world challenges.

More over, the professional accomplishment of ACIM and their connected resources raises ethical concerns. The growth of workshops, books, and seminars based on ACIM is seen as capitalizing on individuals' spiritual needs and vulnerabilities. Authorities argue that the commercialization of spirituality can result in the exploitation of seekers, who might spend significant time and money into methods that finally don't produce on the promises. This commercialization can also contribute to the dilution of the course's teachings, as numerous interpretations and changes proliferate, possibly leading to confusion and misapplication of the principles.

Yet another important part to take into account may be the exclusivity and dogmatism that will occasionally accompany the ACIM community. As the program itself promotes general enjoy and forgiveness, the way it is taught and used by some adherents may result in a sense of spiritual elitism. This could create an "us versus them" thinking, where those that follow ACIM are regarded as enlightened, while those who do not are considered as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes can be divisive and counterproductive to the course's supposed targets of peace and unity. Experts fight that true religious development must foster inclusivity and humility, as opposed to creating a hierarchical variation between the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.