Psychologically, the teachings of ACIM could be problematic. The class encourages an application of refusal of the product earth and personal experience, selling the idea that persons should surpass their bodily existence and target solely on religious realities. That perspective can result in a questionnaire of cognitive dissonance, where persons struggle to reconcile their lived activities with the teachings of ACIM. Experts disagree that can lead to psychological stress, as individuals may possibly experience pressured to disregard their feelings, feelings, and physical sounds in favor of an abstract spiritual ideal. Additionally, ACIM's emphasis on the illusory nature of enduring is visible as dismissive of authentic individual struggles and hardships, perhaps reducing the significance of addressing real-world problems and injustices.

The sensible application of ACIM's teachings is also a spot of contention. Though some people report positive transformations and particular growth from following program, the others discover the practices to be useless or even harmful. The course's increased exposure of forgiveness and enjoy is exceptional, but experts disagree that it can be very simplified and naïve, declining a course in miracles  to handle the difficulties of human associations and the need for boundaries and accountability. Also, the course's period and extensive character could be overwhelming for many people, leading to burnout or disillusionment. Critics suggest that enough time and effort expected to accomplish ACIM could be greater allocated to more empirically reinforced healing methods or religious disciplines that have an established background of effectiveness.

The broader influence of ACIM on the religious and self-help towns can be value considering. The program has encouraged an important following and has been incorporated into different New Era and spiritual movements. However, their effect can be seen as a double-edged sword. Using one hand, it has offered a platform for persons seeking spiritual growth and inner peace. On the other hand, its teachings can contribute to a lifestyle of spiritual bypassing, wherever persons use spiritual methods to prevent coping with personal and cultural issues. This could cause a questionnaire of escapism, where the concentrate on spiritual values distracts from the requisite of participating with and approaching real-world challenges.

Furthermore, the professional success of ACIM and its connected components increases moral concerns. The expansion of workshops, books, and seminars centered on ACIM is visible as capitalizing on individuals' religious wants and vulnerabilities. Critics disagree that the commercialization of spirituality may lead to the exploitation of seekers, who may possibly spend significant time and income in to practices that eventually don't produce on the promises. This commercialization may also donate to the dilution of the course's teachings, as different understandings and adaptations proliferate, perhaps resulting in confusion and misapplication of the principles.