The practical application of ACIM's teachings can also be a point of contention. Although some people report good transformations and personal development from following the course, others discover the techniques to be ineffective or even harmful. The course's increased exposure of forgiveness and love is excellent, but authorities fight that it could be overly basic and naïve, declining to address the difficulties of individual relationships and the requirement for limits and accountability. Moreover, the course's length and intensive nature could be overwhelming for some individuals, resulting in burnout or disillusionment. Experts declare that the full time and work needed to perform ACIM could possibly be better allocated to more empirically supported healing practices or spiritual disciplines which have a proven track record of effectiveness.

The broader impact of ACIM on the religious and self-help towns can be worth considering. The course has encouraged a significant subsequent and has been built-into numerous New Age and religious movements. But, their effect is visible as a double-edged sword. non dual teacher  On one hand, it has presented a structure for people seeking spiritual development and inner peace. On another give, their teachings may subscribe to a tradition of religious skipping, where individuals use religious methods to avoid working with personal and cultural issues. This can result in a form of escapism, where in actuality the give attention to religious beliefs distracts from the requisite of participating with and approaching real-world challenges.

Furthermore, the commercial achievement of ACIM and its related resources increases honest concerns. The growth of workshops, books, and seminars predicated on ACIM is visible as capitalizing on individuals' religious needs and vulnerabilities. Authorities disagree that the commercialization of spirituality may result in the exploitation of seekers, who might spend substantial time and money in to methods that finally don't provide on their promises. This commercialization can also donate to the dilution of the course's teachings, as numerous interpretations and adaptations proliferate, possibly leading to confusion and misapplication of the principles.

Yet another critical element to take into account is the exclusivity and dogmatism that can sometimes accompany the ACIM community. Whilst the class it self advances general enjoy and forgiveness, just how it's taught and used by some adherents may lead to an expression of religious elitism. This will develop an "us versus them" thinking, where those that follow ACIM are seen as enlightened, while people who don't are viewed as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes can be divisive and counterproductive to the course's supposed objectives of peace and unity. Critics disagree that true religious development should foster inclusivity and humility, rather than making a hierarchical difference between the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.