A "course in wonders is false" is just a strong assertion that will require a heavy leap to the states, philosophy, and influence of A Course in Miracles (ACIM). ACIM, a spiritual self-study program published by Helen Schucman in the 1970s, presents itself as a religious text that seeks to greatly help persons obtain inner peace and religious change through some classes and a comprehensive philosophical framework. Experts disagree that ACIM's base, methods, and results are difficult and finally untrue. That critique often revolves around many essential items: the dubious beginnings and authorship of the text, the difficult philosophical underpinnings, the mental implications of its teachings, and the entire efficiency of its practices.

The roots of ACIM are contentious. Helen Schucman, a medical and study psychiatrist, stated that the text was determined to her by an inner style she determined as Jesus Christ. That state is achieved with doubt as it lacks empirical evidence and relies greatly on Schucman's personal experience and subjective interpretation. Critics fight that undermines the reliability of ACIM,  david hoffmeister a course in miracles  as it is difficult to confirm the claim of divine dictation. Moreover, Schucman's skilled background in psychology may have affected this content of ACIM, mixing emotional ideas with religious some ideas in ways that some discover questionable. The dependence on a single individual's knowledge increases concerns concerning the detachment and universality of the text.

Philosophically, ACIM is based on a blend of Religious terminology and Eastern mysticism, showing a worldview that some fight is internally inconsistent and contradictory to old-fashioned religious doctrines. As an example, ACIM posits that the substance world is definitely an dream and that correct the reality is simply spiritual. That see may conflict with the empirical and sensible strategies of American idea, which stress the significance of the substance earth and individual experience. Moreover, ACIM's reinterpretation of standard Christian methods, such as for example crime and forgiveness, is visible as distorting core Christian teachings. Critics argue that syncretism results in a dilution and misrepresentation of recognized religious beliefs, possibly leading followers astray from more defined and traditionally grounded spiritual paths.

Psychologically, the teachings of ACIM could be problematic. The course encourages an application of rejection of the substance earth and particular knowledge, promoting the proven fact that people should surpass their physical existence and concentration only on spiritual realities. That perspective may lead to a questionnaire of cognitive dissonance, wherever persons battle to reconcile their existed activities with the teachings of ACIM. Authorities disagree this can result in mental hardship, as persons may possibly sense pressured to dismiss their feelings, thoughts, and physical sounds in favor of an abstract spiritual ideal. Moreover, ACIM's emphasis on the illusory character of putting up with is seen as dismissive of true individual problems and hardships, perhaps minimizing the importance of addressing real-world problems and injustices.