The useful application of ACIM's teachings can be a spot of contention. While some people record positive transformations and particular development from following a course, others discover the practices to be ineffective as well as harmful. The course's increased exposure of forgiveness and love is admirable, but critics disagree that it could be very easy and naïve, declining to handle the difficulties of human associations and the need for boundaries and accountability. Additionally, the course's size and rigorous nature could be overwhelming for some individuals, ultimately causing burnout or disillusionment. Critics suggest that the time and energy required to accomplish ACIM could possibly be greater spent on more empirically reinforced therapeutic techniques or religious professions that have a proven track record of effectiveness.

The broader impact of ACIM on the spiritual and self-help towns is also worth considering. The class has inspired a substantial following and has been incorporated into various New Age and spiritual movements. Nevertheless, their impact is seen as a double-edged sword. On one give, it's offered a framework for individuals seeking religious development david hoffmeister a course in miracles  and inner peace. On the other give, their teachings can subscribe to a tradition of religious skipping, wherever persons use religious methods in order to avoid dealing with personal and cultural issues. This can result in a form of escapism, where the focus on religious values distracts from the necessity of interesting with and approaching real-world challenges.

Moreover, the industrial achievement of ACIM and their connected products raises moral concerns. The expansion of workshops, publications, and seminars based on ACIM is visible as capitalizing on individuals' spiritual wants and vulnerabilities. Experts disagree that the commercialization of spirituality may lead to the exploitation of seekers, who may possibly invest significant time and income in to techniques that ultimately do not offer on their promises. This commercialization also can subscribe to the dilution of the course's teachings, as various understandings and adaptations proliferate, probably leading to distress and misapplication of the principles.

Yet another important part to think about may be the exclusivity and dogmatism that can occasionally accompany the ACIM community. While the program it self encourages general enjoy and forgiveness, the way in which it's taught and practiced by some adherents may result in a feeling of religious elitism. This can create an "people versus them" mentality, where people who follow ACIM are regarded as enlightened, while people who don't are viewed as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes can be divisive and counterproductive to the course's purported targets of peace and unity. Critics disagree that correct spiritual development must foster inclusivity and humility, rather than developing a hierarchical difference involving the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.