A "class in miracles is false" is a strong assertion that requires a strong jump in to the claims, philosophy, and affect of A Course in Miracles (ACIM). ACIM, a religious self-study plan published by Helen Schucman in the 1970s, presents itself as a spiritual text that seeks to help people obtain internal peace and spiritual transformation through some classes and a thorough philosophical framework. Authorities fight that ACIM's basis, methods, and email address details are problematic and eventually untrue. That critique often revolves about many important points: the questionable beginnings and authorship of the writing, the problematic philosophical underpinnings, the emotional implications of its teachings, and the entire efficiency of its practices.

The roots of ACIM are contentious. Helen Schucman, a scientific and study psychologist, said that the text was formed to her by an inner voice she identified as Jesus Christ. That claim is achieved with doubt since it lacks scientific evidence and depends seriously on Schucman's personal experience and subjective interpretation. Experts disagree this undermines the reliability the christ  of ACIM, because it is hard to substantiate the declare of heavenly dictation. More over, Schucman's professional history in psychology might have affected the content of ACIM, mixing mental ideas with religious a few ideas in ways that some discover questionable. The reliance on a single individual's experience increases considerations concerning the detachment and universality of the text.

Philosophically, ACIM is dependant on a blend of Christian terminology and Eastern mysticism, delivering a worldview that some fight is internally irregular and contradictory to conventional spiritual doctrines. For example, ACIM posits that the substance earth is definitely an dream and that correct reality is strictly spiritual. That view may conflict with the empirical and reasonable approaches of American philosophy, which stress the significance of the substance world and individual experience. Moreover, ACIM's reinterpretation of standard Religious ideas, such as for example crime and forgiveness, is visible as distorting key Christian teachings. Experts disagree that this syncretism contributes to a dilution and misunderstanding of established religious values, potentially leading readers astray from more defined and historically seated spiritual paths.

Psychologically, the teachings of ACIM can be problematic. The program encourages a form of refusal of the substance world and personal knowledge, promoting the idea that persons should surpass their bodily existence and focus entirely on religious realities. That perception can lead to a form of cognitive dissonance, wherever persons struggle to reconcile their lived activities with the teachings of ACIM. Critics argue that this can lead to mental hardship, as persons may possibly feel pressured to dismiss their thoughts, feelings, and physical feelings in favor of an abstract spiritual ideal. Furthermore, ACIM's focus on the illusory nature of suffering is visible as dismissive of genuine individual struggles and hardships, probably minimizing the importance of approaching real-world problems and injustices.