A "class in miracles is false" is just a strong assertion that requires a heavy leap to the claims, viewpoint, and impact of A Course in Miracles (ACIM). ACIM, a religious self-study program published by Helen Schucman in the 1970s, comes up as a religious text that seeks to help people achieve internal peace and religious change through a series of classes and a comprehensive philosophical framework. Critics disagree that ACIM's base, strategies, and email address details are difficult and ultimately untrue. That critique usually revolves around many critical points: the questionable roots and authorship of the writing, the difficult philosophical underpinnings, the emotional implications of its teachings, and the general usefulness of its practices.

The origins of ACIM are contentious. Helen Schucman, a medical and study psychologist, stated that the writing was determined to her by an inner voice she recognized as Jesus Christ. That state is met with doubt as it lacks empirical evidence and depends greatly on Schucman's personal knowledge and subjective interpretation. Critics disagree that undermines the reliability of a course in miracles  ACIM, since it is difficult to substantiate the maintain of heavenly dictation. More over, Schucman's skilled background in psychology may have influenced this content of ACIM, blending emotional ideas with religious a few ideas in a way that some find questionable. The reliance on a single individual's experience increases problems concerning the detachment and universality of the text.

Philosophically, ACIM is based on a blend of Religious terminology and Eastern mysticism, presenting a worldview that some argue is internally unpredictable and contradictory to conventional spiritual doctrines. As an example, ACIM posits that the product world is an illusion and that correct the reality is solely spiritual. That see may struggle with the scientific and logical methods of European idea, which emphasize the importance of the material earth and individual experience. Additionally, ACIM's reinterpretation of conventional Religious methods, such as sin and forgiveness, is visible as distorting core Christian teachings. Critics fight that syncretism results in a dilution and misunderstanding of established religious values, probably major supporters astray from more defined and traditionally grounded religious paths.

Psychologically, the teachings of ACIM could be problematic. The program encourages a questionnaire of denial of the substance earth and particular knowledge, promoting the indisputable fact that people should transcend their bodily existence and focus solely on religious realities. That perception can lead to a form of cognitive dissonance, wherever persons struggle to reconcile their lived activities with the teachings of ACIM. Experts disagree that may result in emotional stress, as persons may sense pressured to neglect their feelings, feelings, and bodily sounds in favor of an abstract spiritual ideal. Additionally, ACIM's increased exposure of the illusory nature of putting up with can be seen as dismissive of true individual problems and hardships, probably minimizing the importance of approaching real-world issues and injustices.