A "program in miracles is false" is just a bold assertion that needs a strong plunge in to the statements, idea, and impact of A Class in Miracles (ACIM). ACIM, a spiritual self-study program written by Helen Schucman in the 1970s, comes up as a spiritual text that seeks to simply help persons obtain internal peace and spiritual transformation through a series of instructions and a comprehensive philosophical framework. Experts disagree that ACIM's base, strategies, and answers are problematic and ultimately untrue. This critique frequently revolves about several important points: the debateable roots and authorship of the writing, the problematic philosophical underpinnings, the mental implications of their teachings, and the entire efficiency of their practices.

The sources of ACIM are contentious. Helen Schucman, a scientific and research psychiatrist, stated that the text was determined to her by an internal voice she recognized as Jesus Christ. That claim is met with doubt as it lacks empirical evidence and relies greatly on Schucman's personal experience and subjective interpretation. Critics disagree this undermines the credibility of a course in miracles  ACIM, since it is difficult to confirm the declare of heavenly dictation. Moreover, Schucman's professional history in psychology might have affected this content of ACIM, mixing psychological ideas with religious ideas in a way that some find questionable. The dependence about the same individual's knowledge raises problems about the detachment and universality of the text.

Philosophically, ACIM is founded on a blend of Religious terminology and Western mysticism, delivering a worldview that some fight is internally contradictory and contradictory to conventional religious doctrines. As an example, ACIM posits that the material world is definitely an illusion and that correct the reality is purely spiritual. That see can conflict with the empirical and realistic strategies of Western philosophy, which emphasize the importance of the material world and individual experience. Additionally, ACIM's reinterpretation of conventional Religious methods, such as for instance crime and forgiveness, is visible as distorting primary Christian teachings. Experts argue that this syncretism results in a dilution and misunderstanding of recognized spiritual values, possibly major readers astray from more defined and traditionally seated spiritual paths.

Psychologically, the teachings of ACIM can be problematic. The class encourages an application of denial of the substance world and personal knowledge, marketing the indisputable fact that persons must surpass their physical existence and emphasis exclusively on religious realities. This perception may cause an application of cognitive dissonance, where people struggle to reconcile their existed experiences with the teachings of ACIM. Experts disagree that this can lead to emotional hardship, as persons might experience pressured to ignore their feelings, thoughts, and physical sensations and only an abstract spiritual ideal. Additionally, ACIM's focus on the illusory nature of suffering is visible as dismissive of true individual struggles and hardships, potentially reducing the significance of approaching real-world problems and injustices.