A "class in wonders is false" is a striking assertion that will require a strong leap in to the states, viewpoint, and influence of A Program in Miracles (ACIM). ACIM, a spiritual self-study program written by Helen Schucman in the 1970s, occurs as a religious text that aims to greatly help persons achieve inner peace and religious transformation through a series of instructions and a thorough philosophical framework. Experts fight that ACIM's basis, strategies, and answers are difficult and fundamentally untrue. That review often revolves around many essential points: the debateable roots and authorship of the writing, the problematic philosophical underpinnings, the mental implications of its teachings, and the general efficiency of their practices.

The origins of ACIM are contentious. Helen Schucman, a clinical and study psychiatrist, stated that the writing was dictated to her by an interior voice she determined as Jesus Christ. This state is achieved with skepticism as it lacks scientific evidence and relies greatly on Schucman's personal knowledge and subjective interpretation. Authorities disagree this undermines the reliability a course in miracles  of ACIM, because it is difficult to confirm the state of heavenly dictation. Moreover, Schucman's professional background in psychology might have inspired this content of ACIM, mixing emotional concepts with religious some ideas in ways that some discover questionable. The dependence on a single individual's knowledge increases issues in regards to the objectivity and universality of the text.

Philosophically, ACIM is founded on a blend of Religious terminology and Western mysticism, offering a worldview that some disagree is internally irregular and contradictory to old-fashioned spiritual doctrines. For example, ACIM posits that the product earth is an illusion and that correct reality is strictly spiritual. This see may struggle with the scientific and reasonable strategies of European viewpoint, which stress the importance of the material earth and human experience. Furthermore, ACIM's reinterpretation of conventional Religious methods, such as for instance sin and forgiveness, is seen as distorting primary Christian teachings. Experts disagree that syncretism leads to a dilution and misrepresentation of established religious values, perhaps leading followers astray from more defined and historically grounded religious paths.

Psychologically, the teachings of ACIM can be problematic. The course encourages a form of denial of the product world and particular knowledge, selling the idea that persons must transcend their bodily existence and target solely on religious realities. This perception can cause a questionnaire of cognitive dissonance, where individuals battle to reconcile their lived experiences with the teachings of ACIM. Experts fight that can result in mental hardship, as individuals may sense pressured to dismiss their thoughts, thoughts, and physical sensations in support of an abstract spiritual ideal. Also, ACIM's increased exposure of the illusory nature of enduring is visible as dismissive of authentic individual problems and hardships, perhaps reducing the significance of approaching real-world issues and injustices.