A "class in wonders is false" is just a strong assertion that requires a heavy plunge to the states, viewpoint, and impact of A Program in Wonders (ACIM). ACIM, a religious self-study program compiled by Helen Schucman in the 1970s, presents itself as a spiritual text that seeks to simply help people obtain inner peace and religious transformation through some classes and a thorough philosophical framework. Experts fight that ACIM's foundation, methods, and email address details are problematic and finally untrue. This critique usually revolves around a few key details: the dubious beginnings and authorship of the text, the problematic philosophical underpinnings, the emotional implications of its teachings, and the entire effectiveness of their practices.

The roots of ACIM are contentious. Helen Schucman, a medical and research psychologist, stated that the writing was dictated to her by an interior voice she determined as Jesus Christ. This state is achieved with skepticism because it lacks scientific evidence and relies heavily on Schucman's personal knowledge and subjective interpretation. Authorities argue that acim  undermines the credibility of ACIM, because it is hard to substantiate the declare of divine dictation. Moreover, Schucman's qualified background in psychology could have influenced this content of ACIM, mixing psychological concepts with religious some ideas in a way that some discover questionable. The reliance about the same individual's knowledge improves considerations concerning the detachment and universality of the text.

Philosophically, ACIM is based on a blend of Christian terminology and Eastern mysticism, offering a worldview that some disagree is internally unpredictable and contradictory to traditional spiritual doctrines. For example, ACIM posits that the product world is an illusion and that true reality is just spiritual. That view can conflict with the empirical and rational methods of European idea, which stress the significance of the material earth and individual experience. Additionally, ACIM's reinterpretation of old-fashioned Religious concepts, such as for example sin and forgiveness, is visible as distorting primary Christian teachings. Experts disagree that this syncretism leads to a dilution and misrepresentation of recognized religious values, possibly leading readers astray from more coherent and historically seated religious paths.

Psychologically, the teachings of ACIM may be problematic. The course encourages a questionnaire of refusal of the substance world and particular knowledge, selling the indisputable fact that persons must surpass their physical existence and emphasis exclusively on religious realities. This perspective can result in a questionnaire of cognitive dissonance, where persons battle to reconcile their existed experiences with the teachings of ACIM. Authorities argue that can result in emotional distress, as persons may sense pressured to neglect their thoughts, ideas, and bodily sensations and only an abstract spiritual ideal. Furthermore, ACIM's emphasis on the illusory character of suffering is seen as dismissive of genuine individual struggles and hardships, probably reducing the importance of handling real-world problems and injustices.