A "program in wonders is false" is a strong assertion that needs a strong jump in to the statements, viewpoint, and influence of A Course in Wonders (ACIM). ACIM, a spiritual self-study program published by Helen Schucman in the 1970s, presents itself as a religious text that seeks to greatly help people obtain internal peace and spiritual change through some lessons and a thorough philosophical framework. Experts argue that ACIM's base, techniques, and email address details are problematic and ultimately untrue. This critique frequently revolves about a few essential details: the debateable roots and authorship of the text, the difficult philosophical underpinnings, the emotional implications of their teachings, and the general efficacy of its practices.

The sources of ACIM are contentious. Helen Schucman, a clinical and study psychiatrist, claimed that the writing was determined to her by an interior style she discovered as Jesus Christ. This maintain is met with doubt as it lacks scientific evidence and depends greatly on Schucman's personal experience and subjective interpretation. Experts argue that this undermines a course in miracles  the standing of ACIM, as it is hard to confirm the state of heavenly dictation. More over, Schucman's professional history in psychology might have inspired this content of ACIM, blending mental concepts with religious ideas in ways that some discover questionable. The dependence about the same individual's knowledge raises issues about the detachment and universality of the text.

Philosophically, ACIM is dependant on a blend of Religious terminology and Eastern mysticism, showing a worldview that some fight is internally contradictory and contradictory to traditional religious doctrines. For instance, ACIM posits that the product world is definitely an dream and that true the reality is simply spiritual. That view may conflict with the scientific and realistic strategies of American viewpoint, which stress the significance of the substance earth and human experience. Moreover, ACIM's reinterpretation of standard Christian concepts, such as for instance failure and forgiveness, can be seen as distorting core Religious teachings. Experts disagree that this syncretism results in a dilution and misrepresentation of recognized religious values, probably major followers astray from more defined and traditionally grounded spiritual paths.

Psychologically, the teachings of ACIM may be problematic. The program encourages a form of refusal of the product earth and particular experience, promoting the proven fact that individuals should transcend their physical living and concentration only on religious realities. This perspective can result in a questionnaire of cognitive dissonance, where people battle to reconcile their lived experiences with the teachings of ACIM. Experts fight that can lead to psychological hardship, as individuals may sense pressured to overlook their feelings, ideas, and bodily feelings in support of an abstract religious ideal. Moreover, ACIM's increased exposure of the illusory nature of enduring is visible as dismissive of real human struggles and hardships, probably reducing the significance of approaching real-world issues and injustices.