The sensible request of ACIM's teachings can be a place of contention. While some persons record good transformations and personal growth from following a class, the others find the methods to be useless as well as harmful. The course's focus on forgiveness and love is excellent, but experts fight that it could be excessively simplified and naïve, declining to handle the complexities of individual associations and the requirement for limits and accountability. Moreover, the course's period and rigorous character can be frustrating for many people, resulting in burnout or disillusionment. Critics claim that the time and energy needed to perform ACIM could possibly be better spent on more empirically reinforced healing techniques or spiritual disciplines which have a proven track record of effectiveness.

The broader influence of ACIM on the religious and self-help neighborhoods can be price considering. The course has encouraged an important subsequent and has been built-into various New Era and religious movements. However, its impact can be seen as a double-edged sword. On one hand, it has presented a construction for un curso de milagros  persons seeking religious development and internal peace. On the other hand, their teachings can subscribe to a lifestyle of religious skipping, where people use religious concepts in order to avoid working with particular and social issues. This could result in an application of escapism, where in actuality the focus on spiritual ideals distracts from the necessity of participating with and addressing real-world challenges.

More over, the industrial achievement of ACIM and its connected materials raises moral concerns. The growth of workshops, books, and seminars centered on ACIM is seen as capitalizing on individuals' spiritual wants and vulnerabilities. Experts disagree that the commercialization of spirituality can result in the exploitation of seekers, who might invest significant time and money in to methods that finally don't provide on their promises. That commercialization can also donate to the dilution of the course's teachings, as various interpretations and adaptations proliferate, probably ultimately causing distress and misapplication of the principles.

Another critical element to think about could be the exclusivity and dogmatism that may often accompany the ACIM community. Whilst the class it self encourages general enjoy and forgiveness, the way in which it is taught and used by some adherents can lead to an expression of spiritual elitism. This could build an "people versus them" mentality, where those who follow ACIM are viewed as enlightened, while people who do not are viewed as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes may be divisive and counterproductive to the course's proposed targets of peace and unity. Critics disagree that true spiritual development must foster inclusivity and humility, rather than creating a hierarchical difference involving the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.