Another point of competition is the way ACIM has been marketed and commercialized. Since its distribution, ACIM has spawned a substantial market of workshops, seminars, and supplementary materials. Experts disagree this commercialization undermines the religious reliability of the teachings, turning what is proposed to become a holy text right into a profit-driven enterprise. The growth of ACIM-related products and services and services has led some to problem the motivations behind their promotion and the authenticity of those who claim to instruct its principles. That industrial part can make a barrier to true spiritual exploration, as persons may become more centered on getting the next book or participating the next workshop as opposed to engaging profoundly with the teachings themselves.

Additionally, the course's increased exposure of specific transformation by way of a modify in understanding is seen as very easy in approaching complicated social and systemic issues. ACIM areas a powerful emphasis on particular david hoffmeister and the power of the mind to shape one's reality. While this can be empowering, it can also cause an application of spiritual skipping, where people use religious ideas to avoid confronting hard areas of their lives or societal injustices. By concentrating primarily on changing one's notion, ACIM might neglect the importance of using concrete actions to address social, financial, and environmental challenges. That inward concentration can lead to a form of isolationism, wherever persons become therefore consumed within their personal religious trip which they neglect their responsibilities to the broader community.

The language and type of ACIM also present a barrier to its convenience and acceptance. The text is written in a dense, archaic type that mimics the Master David Bible, which is often off-putting and hard to comprehend for all readers. That difficulty can make an aura of mystique and exclusivity round the teachings, which makes it look as though only those who find themselves adequately enlightened or focused can grasp their meaning. That inaccessibility may perpetuate a hierarchical dynamic, wherever teachers and sophisticated students are regarded as possessing particular information that is out of take the average person. Such makeup may foster dependence and hinder the power of people to get their very own spiritual path.

The community of ACIM practitioners also can contribute to the belief of the course as a cult-like movement. The powerful sense of identity and group cohesion among some ACIM readers can make an atmosphere wherever dissenting opinions are not accepted and where important thinking is discouraged. This will lead to a questionnaire of groupthink, where customers reinforce each other's values and understandings of the writing without subjecting them to arduous scrutiny. Such an insular community may be tolerant to external review and can build an us-versus-them mentality, more alienating it from mainstream acceptance and reinforcing the notion of ACIM as a perimeter or cult-like phenomenon.