Our concern about filtering in this case isn't whether a person will try to skip this, and that remark was just to further the stage that filters aren't always effective. Maybe mentioning the intentional bypassing was a bit off topic for my prior comment. As mentioned before, the quantity of OSRS-specific articles (not relevant to RS3) submitted here is minimal as is, and they don't amount to a prominent portion of our everyday posts. However, those posts are outnumbered by others which compare or link to both OSRS Accounts
These would probably match the standards additionally to obtain a reply redirecting them to 2007 Runescape when the intention was to post here, which is not ideal because it could be irrelevant to this article topic and likely lead to complaints. Furthermore, if the criteria is too specific, it is improbable that the few articles which are designed to obtain this response will trigger it. It's much easier for a individual to identify these posts and setting it up to work as intended is easier said than done for advantage.
Why are people so toxic to players? Wouldn't the and also max high ranking players want people to play? More people = more money, more upgrades (possibly if more began playing, paying( and demanding it) and more people in Runescape game that will grow the economy and keep Runescape lasting more. Frankly, new players are treated by us when they are labeled as such. Dig up any ribbon folks here actually pile on the service most of the time and where the OP acknowledges themselves fresh.
It's older, returning veteran players who ask questions we treat. Unless they are asking about the state of Runescape(meaning they aren't invested in Runescape again yet), normally we bad mouth them about how they could possibly be asking whatever it is they're asking. The community is smart. If somebody is uninvested in Runescape, everyone is support towards them. If they are already invested, no one cares.
So, I am super tardy to the celebration and I apologize for that. I do think using a question thread would be beneficial in the long run. However, it's a matter of handling what the topics are. That's a bummer because we could only have 2 at a time. I replied to someone earlier agreeing that we can start making a weekly article that links to news/update posts are added as the week continues on and they're printed to Runescape's website. And that proposal and I handed on to the remainder of the group. What we're doing now is a matter of,"What exactly do we believe needs to be seen the most?" Having it on one post and upgraded as necessary could help solve that matter.
It's bothered me several times since I changed from OSRS into RS3. I thought the OSRS Reddit community was shitty but at least if I posted a query (whether it be in a thread or it's own thread) folks would not make me feel as if I'm doing something unpleasant. I have always seen the downvote button as like a correlation index, and only actually downvote stuff if it is wildly off topic. It seems like this sub just likes to downvote individuals for being fresh, I can not say I know it, but I don't really give a shit anymore. Should my queries maintain karma? Definitely, they're just questions. Nothing negative or positive about them. Do they? No, but sometimes they even back outside to impartial after initially getting several downvotes (seems some folks understand that downvoted questions become Buy RS3 Gold and try to bring up them ). It should not be like this.
English
Arabic
Français
Español
Português
Deutsch
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Romaian