Addressing the many challenges posed by rare diseases to patients, families, and society at large demands a specific national (as well as transnational) focus. Historically, the practice of elaborating and adopting national plans and strategies for rare diseases, following a request from the European Commission in 2009, has been an essential means of ensuring this focus, with 25 European Member States having adopted a plan or strategy at some stage. However, from the vantage point of late 2020, there are signs that momentum and commitment to the development, implementation, and renewal of national plans is waning, in some cases. In this article, we examine the status quo and explore the trend for national plans and strategies to expire without clear commitments or timelines for replacement. We also examine the factors and institutions which supported the initial drive towards the adoption of national plans and strategies in Europe and consider the very different climate in which the next generation of national policies may-or may not-be shaped.Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) and programed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand PD-L1 have increased the survival and cure rates for patients with many cancer types in various disease settings. However, only 10-40% of cancer patients benefited from these ICIs, of whom ~ 20% have treatment interruption or discontinuation due to immune-related adverse events that can be severe and even fatal. Current efforts in precision immunotherapy are focused on improving biomarker-based patient selection for currently available ICIs and exploring rationale combination and novel strategies to expand the benefit of immunotherapy to more cancer patients. Neoantigens arise from ~ 10% of the non-synonymous somatic mutations in cancer cells, are important targets of T cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity for individual patients. Advances in next generation sequencing technology and computational bioinformatics have enable the identification of genomic alterations, putative neoantigens, and gene expression profiling in individual tumors for personal oncology in a rapid and cost-effective way. Among the genomic biomarkers, defective mismatch DNA repair (dMMR), microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) and high tumor mutational burden (H-TMB) have received FDA approvals for selecting patients for ICI treatment. All these biomarkers measure high neoantigen load and tumor antigenicity, supporting the current development of neoantigen-based personalized cancer vaccines for patients with high TMB tumor. Several studies have shown neoantigen vaccines are feasible, safe and have promising clinical activity in patients with high TMB tumors in both metastatic and adjuvant settings. This review summarizes the emerging data and technologies for neoantigen-based personalized immunotherapy.In recent years, there has been a progressive trend towards less invasive technologies for detecting metastatic cancer and guiding therapy with the goal of lower morbidity, better outcomes, and superior cosmetic appearance than traditional methods. This mini-review examines three emerging noninvasive hybrid technologies for detecting primary cancer, metastasis and guiding thermal therapy. Real-time thermoacoustic imaging and thermometry potentially provides valuable and critical feedback for guiding focused microwave ablation therapy. Label-free photoacoustic monitoring of cancer cells is a promising clinical diagnostic and theranostic tool for detecting metastatic disease and monitoring the response to therapy. Finally, immunologically targeted gold nanoparticles combined with photoacoustic imaging is able to detect lymph node micrometastasis in mouse models of breast cancer. These emerging techniques have the potential to improve the decision to biopsy, provide more accurate prognosis, and enhance the efficacy of therapy for early and late stage cancers.This manuscript is a summary of findings focusing on various aspects of secondary lymphedema specifically as a sequelae of treatment for cancer. The topic was addressed at a session held during the 8th International Congress on Cancer Metastasis that was unique a for the inclusion of patients with lymphedema and therapists joining physicians, healthcare professionals, and researchers in an effort to give an overview of secondary lymphedema following cancer therapy as well as highlighting the unknowns in the field. Lymphedema is defined and both diagnosis and incidence of cancer-related lymphedema are explored. Further, exploration of imaging options for lymphedema and information on the genetic research for patients with cancer-related secondary lymphedema are presented. Patient education and early detection methods are then explored followed by conservative treatment. Finally, an examination of surgical treatment methods available for patients with lymphedema is covered. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ddo-2728.html Overall, this manuscript presents valuable information and updates for those not familiar with incidence, diagnosis, early detection, and rehabilitation of patients with cancer-related secondary lymphedema.Precision treatment for breast cancers has made several notable advances in recent decades, but challenges of tumor heterogeneity, drug resistance, and aggressive recurrence and metastases remain. To meet and overcome these challenges, we must refine our understanding of breast subtypes and treatment biomarkers according to the knowledge afforded across the spectrum of 'omics assays. A critical aspect of harnessing this knowledge into actionable biomarkers for treatment decision relies on our ability to integrate knowledge across data types and leverage our insight in evidence-based clinical trials. We review recent advances in cutting-edge clinical trials for precision treatment of breast cancer, including chemotherapies, targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and combination therapies. We comment on promising future areas of development for this exciting point in precision breast cancer research.Brain metastasis (BM) frequently occurs in patients with cutaneous melanoma, lung, and breast cancer; although, BM rarely arises from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The reported incidence of GIT cancer BM is less than 4%. In the last few years, effective systemic therapy has prolonged the survival of GIT patients and consequently, the incidence of developing BM is rising. Therefore, the epidemiology and biology of BM arising from GIT cancer requires a more comprehensive understanding. In spite of the development of new therapeutic agents for patients with metastatic GIT cancers, survival for patients with BM still remains poor, with a median survival after diagnosis of less than 4 months. Limited evidence suggests that early detection of isolated intra-cranial lesions will enable surgical resection plus systemic and/or radiation therapy, which may lead to an increase in overall survival. Novel diagnostic methods such as blood-based biomarker biopsies may play a crucial role in the early detection of BM.