Proximal humerus fractures, although common, have high rates of failure after open reduction and internal fixation. The use of a fibular allograft has been explored as a means to decrease complications, particularly varus collapse and the need for revision surgery. The authors performed a retrospective review of 133 proximal humerus fractures managed surgically with locking plates (n=72) or locking plates with fibular allograft intramedullary struts (n=61). Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected and analyzed. The fibular allograft group was more likely to be older (P less then .01), be female (P=.04), and have a history of osteoporosis (P=.01). No differences were noted in the proportions of 2-, 3-, or 4-part fractures between groups. Average follow-up was 28 weeks. Medial calcar length was longer in the locking plate only group (P=.04); however, this group demonstrated a decreased head shaft angle (P=.01) and a trend toward increased rates of varus collapse (P=.06). No significant differences were found regarding other radiographic complications, irrespective of fracture complexity. A notable decrease in fluoroscopy time was seen with strut use (P=.04), but operative time and blood loss were similar between groups. A significant decrease in revision surgery rate was found with use of an allograft strut (P=.05). Using a strut appears to preserve the radiographic head shaft angle and decrease the risk of fracture collapse in 2-, 3-, and 4-part fractures, without increasing surgical time or morbidity. Use of an intramedullary strut appears to reduce the need for revision surgery, particularly in 3- and 4-part fractures. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(5)262-268.].All-polyethylene glenoid components designed for osseous integration of the central peg can be placed with no graft (NG), autogenous bone graft (ABG), or demineralized bone matrix (DBM). The purpose of this study was to compare osseous integration with these 3 techniques. A randomized controlled trial was performed of 153 total shoulder arthroplasties using a pegged allpolyethylene glenoid component designed for osseous integration. Central peg treatment included NG, ABG, or DBM. The primary outcome was central peg osseous integration defined as bone presence between the central fins 1 year postoperatively. Central osseous integration was observed in 90% of cases treated with ABG, 68% of cases treated with DBM, and 68% of cases treated with NG (P=.022). Postoperative Wirth grading revealed radiolucency around the central peg (grade 1) in 2.4% of cases with ABG, 5.4% of cases with DBM, and 9.8% of cases with NG (P=.134). At short-term follow-up, osseous integration of the central peg of an all-polyethylene glenoid designed for bony growth between the central fins appears to be highest when treating the central peg with ABG compared with leaving the central peg untreated or using DBM. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/py-60.html [Orthopedics. 2020;43(5)278-283.].Traumatic lower-extremity amputations often result in complications and surgical revisions. The authors report the in-hospital morbidity and mortality of traumatic lower-extremity amputations at a metropolitan level I trauma center for a large rural region and compare below-knee (BK) vs higher-level amputation complications. They retrospectively reviewed 168 adult patients during a 10-year period (2005 to 2015) who had a traumatic injury to the lower extremity that required an amputation. Main outcome measurements included amputation level, complication rates, intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, length of stay, total trips to the operating room (OR), and Injury Severity Score (ISS). A total of 95 patients had through-knee/above-knee (TK/AK) amputations, and 73 patients had BK amputations. The majority of injuries occurred in the non-urban setting. The TK/AK group had higher ICU admission rates (76% vs 35%, P less then .0001), longer overall hospital length of stay (22.0 vs 15.5 days, P=.01), more total OR trips (6.5 vs 5.0, P=.04), and higher ISS (17.0 vs 11.5, P less then .0001). A complication was experienced by 64% of all patients during the initial hospitalization. The TK/AK group had higher complication rates than the BK group, including wound infection, pulmonary embolus, rhabdomyolysis, compartment syndrome, and death. Patients with TK/AK traumatic amputations have a greater burden of injury with higher complication rates, increased ICU admissions, increased length of stay, and increased ISS and require more return trips to the OR compared with patients with BK amputations. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6)e561-e566.].The purpose of this study was to determine whether direct visualization of adjustable-loop cortical suspensory button deployment onto the lateral femur increases the cortical contact rate of the button, thereby improving clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Sixty-five single-bundle anteromedial portal ACL reconstructions using an adjustable-loop button were retrospectively divided into 2 groups according to use of the blind pulling technique (control group; 32 patients) or the direct visualization technique (visualization group; 33 patients) when confirming deployment of the button. Cortical contact rate of the button on immediate and 2-year postoperative radiographs, knee stability measured using a KT-1000 arthrometer, and functional scores (Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee score) at 2 years postoperative were compared between the groups. There was no significant difference in femoral cortical contact rate between the groups immediately (56% control group vs 55% visualization group; P=1.000) and at 2 years postoperative (78% control group vs 82% visualization group; P=.764). At 2 years postoperative, there was no difference between the groups regarding knee stability (1.3±0.9 mm vs 1.5±0.8 mm, respectively; P=.404), Lysholm score (P=.436), and International Knee Documentation Committee score (P=.507). Confirmation of adjustable-loop button deployment under direct visualization during anteromedial portal ACL reconstruction neither increased cortical contact rate nor improved clinical outcomes. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(5);270-276.].