To determine preoperative factors predictive of improvement in pain and function after elective implant removal. We hypothesized that patients undergoing orthopaedic implant removal to relieve pain would have significant improvements in both pain and function. Prospective cohort study. Level I Trauma Center. One hundred eighty-nine patients were enrolled after consenting for orthopaedic implant removal to address residual pain. One hundred sixty-three were available for 3-month follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative outcome measures including Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores were compared. Preoperative scores, surgeon prediction of pain improvement, and palpable implants were analyzed as predictors of outcomes. Median PROMIS physical function and pain interference scores and visual analogue scale significantly improved by 6, 8, and 2 points, respectively (P < 0.001 for all). Worse preinjury scores predicted improvement in respective postoperative outcomes (P < 0.001 for all). Surgeon prediction of improvement was associated with improved PROMIS pain interference (P = 0.005), patient subjective assessment of pain improvement (P = 0.03), and subjective percent of pain remaining at 3 months (P = 0.02). Implant superficial palpability was not predictive for any postoperative outcomes. Although the primary indication for implant removal in this population was pain relief, many patients also had a clinically relevant improvement in physical function. In addition, patients who start with worse global indices of pain and function are more likely to improve after implant removal. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ldc195943-imt1.html This suggests that implant-related pain directly contributes to global dysfunction. Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Delays to surgery for patients with geriatric hip fracture are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The American Heart Association (AHA) and American College of Cardiology (ACC) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) were created to standardize preoperative cardiology consultation and transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). This study's purpose is to determine if these practices are over used and delay time to surgery at a safety net hospital. Retrospective review. Level 1 trauma center and safety net hospital. Charts were reviewed for indications of preoperative cardiology consultation or TTE per AHA and ACC CPG in 412 patients admitted with geriatric hip fracture. Criteria meeting the AHA/ACC guidelines for preoperative TTE and cardiac consultations. Time to surgical intervention. Despite 17.7% of patients meeting criteria, 44.4% of patients received cardiology consultation. Of those patients, 33.8% met criteria for receiving preoperative TTE but 89.4% received one. Time to surgery was greater for patients receiving cardiology consultation (25.42 ± 14.54 hours, P-value <0.001) versus those who did not (19.27 ± 13.76, P-value <0.001) and for those receiving preoperative TTE (26.00 ± 15.33 hours, P-value <0.001) versus those who did not (18.94 ± 12.92, P-value <0.001). Cardiology consultation and TTE are frequently used against AHA/ACC CPG. These measures are expensive and delay surgery, which can increase morbidity and mortality. These findings persisted despite limited resources available in a safety net hospital. Hospitals should improve adherence to CPG, or modify protocols. Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Assess the burden and co-occurrence of pain, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among service members who sustained a major limb injury, and examine whether these conditions are associated with functional outcomes. A retrospective cohort study. Four U.S. military treatment facilities Walter Reed Army Medical Center, National Naval Medical Center, Brooke Army Medical Center, and Naval Medical Center San Diego. Four hundred twenty-nine United States service members who sustained a major limb injury while serving in Afghanistan or Iraq met eligibility criteria upon review of their medical records. Not applicable. Outcomes assessed were function using the short musculoskeletal functional assessment; PTSD using the PTSD Checklist and diagnostic and statistical manual criteria; pain using the chronic pain grade scale. Military extremity trauma and amputation/limb salvage patients without pain, depression, or PTSD, were, on average, about one minimally clinically important difference III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. To evaluate the functional outcomes of patients with displaced patellar fractures treated with anterior plate constructs. Prospective cohort and retrospective clinical and radiographic assessment. Level I Trauma Center. Between 2014 and 2018, 18 patients who underwent operative intervention for an isolated, displaced patella fracture (OTA/AO 34C1-3) with a minimum of 1-year follow-up agreed to participate in the study. The mean follow-up was 19.5 ± 6.0 months. Patients were treated with 2.4 or 2.7-mm plates and supplemental screws or cerclage wires. Patients were evaluated with the Short Form-36 Survey and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores and asked about symptomatic implants. The range of motion was assessed by goniometer. The cohort had no wound complications, infections, nonunion, loss of reduction, or implant failure. Active knee flexion was 131 ± 7 degrees. Five patients (28%) endorsed implant irritation. Only one patient (5.5%) underwent implant removal, which consisted of transverse screw removal alone. Twelve of the 14 patients (86%), who were previously employed, returned to work at 10 ± 7 weeks. All Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores subscale scores and the Short Form-36 Survey scores for physical functioning, limitations due to physical health, limitations due to mental health, and social functioning were significantly lower than reference population norms (P < 0.05). Anterior plating provides reliable fixation for displaced patellar fractures and results in a low incidence of implant irritation. However, patients who had anterior fixation for displaced patella fractures continue to exhibit functional deficits at 1-year postoperatively. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.