This thematic review focuses on recently proposed classification of stages in pronounced aortic stenosis based on the prevalence of extravalvular cardiac damage and its modified variant designed for asymptomatic patients. The review presents studies, which analyzed the predictive significance of the proposed classification. The use of this classification allows predicting the course of disease in patients with pronounced aortic stenosis in valve replacement. The classification is based on routinely used structural and functional echocardiographic signs with already proven predictive values with respect of adverse events in patients after aortic valve replacement. The review discusses limitations of the classification for pronounced aortic stenosis stages based on the prevalence of extravalvular cardiac damage.Current infectious endocarditis (IE) is characterized by changes in its etiological and epidemiological profiles associated with increased incidence of IE of undetermined etiology. This requires a search for ways to enhance the effectivity of diagnosis. Microbiologistics along with high-tech methods becomes decisively important for identifying the pathogen by studying cultures of blood and tissues from the affected heart valve. This determines timely diagnosis and treatment to be introduced to medical practice as a component of personalized medicine. The article focuses on the validity and features of microbiological (cultural), immunochemical, and molecular biological [MALDI-TOF MS (matrix-activated laser desorption/ionization with time-of-flight mass spectrometry), polymerase chain reaction, sequencing] studies.Despite obvious success in the management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke, critical ischemia, and lower extremity amputation remains high. Results of clinical studies of new hypoglycemic drugs have demonstrated their high efficacy in decreasing mortality, incidence of cardiovascular complications, and progression of chronic heart failure. At the same time, prevention of atherothrombotic complications is essential for this patient category. Traditionally, the antiaggregant therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is administered to patients with stable atherosclerotic diseases to reduce the risk. Attempts of reducing additionally the risk with ASA combinations with other antiplatelet drugs did not produce an expected result. Theoretical prerequisites suggested that anticoagulant supplements would increase the treatment efficacy in prevention of atherothrombotic complications in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Recently emerged oral anticoagulants can be administered at a considerably lower dose. In the COMPASS study, a combination of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice a day and ASA 100 mg/day compared to ASA 100 mg/day significantly reduced the total risk of stroke and cardiovascular death by 24 % and incidence of stroke and cardiovascular death by 42% and 22 %, respectively. Patients with peripheral artery disease showed for the first time improvement of prognosis, decreased number of amputations, major complications of lower extremity disease. Results of the COMPASS study confirmed the validity of influencing simultaneously the platelet and the coagulation components of hemostasis in patients with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.Goals Discrimination of the time course of functional recovery in early period following ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has prognostic importance. This study aims to establish the ability of the combined systolic-diastolic index (E / (Ea x Sa), for differentiating recoverable myocardium or persistent non-viability in subjects with STEMI.Material and methods 77 patients with first acute STEMI were enrolled to the study. Serial transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) examinations were performed at the time of the admission (immediately after reperfusion), hospital discharge (5±1 days) and control examination (30±2 days). To assess the association between E / (Ea×Sa) index and myocardial recovery, two categories (Transient stunning and persistent non-viability) were defined on basis of improvement of left ventricle ejection fraction (LV EF) (Improvement was defined as an increase more than 10 % in LV EF at day 30 compared to baseline).Results 55 patients (71.4 %) had improvement of LV EF and 24 patients (28.6 %) had no recovery of systolic function (30 days LV EF 48.78±6.1 vs. 39.31±8.1 %, p=0.01). The E / (Ea×Sa) index were significantly higher in the "non-viability" than in stunning group on predischarge and 1 month (1.61±0.64 vs 1.25±0.43, p=0.01 and 1.33±0.25 vs 1.14±0.21, p=0.01, respectively). The change in the E / (Ea×Sa) index in early period (within 5±1 days) was higher in the stunning group (26 %) compared to non-viability group (15 %) (p=0.033). E / (Ea×Sa) index was found to be a significant predictor of myocardial recovery in multivariable logistic regression (OR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.83-0.98, p=0.001). https://www.selleckchem.com/products/BI-2536.html Roc curve showed that the cutoff value of E / (Ea×Sa) index is 1.29 with 73 % of sensitivity and 61 % of specificity (AUC 0.71, p=0.01, CI 0.54-0.89).Conclusions Our findings suggest that E / (Ea×Sa) index is a strong predictor of functional recovery; the odds of recovery decreases as E / (Ea×Sa) index value increases.Objective The importance of nutritional status in non-ST segment elevated acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) is not clear. In this study, the importance of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in terms of in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTE-ACS and its relationship with the Global Record of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score were investigated.Material and methods A total of 498 consecutive NSTE-ACS patients were recorded retrospectively. PNI for nutritional status assessment of patients with NSTE-ACS. PNI was calculated as 10 × serum albumin (g / dL) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count (per mm3). The association between PNI and GRACE risk score was assessed.Results Patients were classified as low-risk group (≤108 points, n=222), medium-risk group (109-140 points, n=161) and high-risk group (>140 points, n=115) according to the GRACE score. The mean PNI value was found to be the lowest in the high-risk group compared to other risk groups. There was a significant negative correlation between GRACE risk score and PNI (p<0.