The aim of this study was to review the top 100 most-cited articles in ophthalmology in Asia since 1970. The Scopus database was used to identify the top 100 most-cited ophthalmology articles published in ophthalmology (T100-Eye) and nonophthalmology (T100-General) journals. The T100-Eye articles were published between 1982 and 2015, and T100-General from 1982 to 2017. T100-Eye had higher citations [median (range) = 317 (249-1326)] than T100-General [158 (105-2628)], but T100-General were published in journals with higher impact factor (IF) than T100-Eye (median IF= 5.5 vs 4.4) and produced more landmark papers (3 vs 1 articles that were cited >1000 times). Fifty-five % of T100-Eye were published in 3 journals Ophthalmology (n = 22), Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (n = 17), and American Journal of Ophthalmology (n = 16). T100-Eye had 88 original research articles and 12 reviews, whereas T100-General had 84 original research and 16 reviews. The most-frequent studied disease categories re studied more in Asia and shows the contribution of specific countries to highly cited publications in ophthalmology research in Asia. The aim of this study was to report topical steroid usage in bacterial keratitis and analyze the effects of steroids on patients' outcomes to the main causative organisms. A retrospective case-series. This study included all patients with corneal scrape positive bacterial keratitis from January 2012 to December 2016 at the Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Cases were identified from pathology results and hospital coding, and data collected from medical records. A total of 313 eyes from 308 patients with a mean age of 51 years [interquartile range (IQR) 36-72] were included. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/gsk-lsd1-2hcl.html Of these patients, 192 (61%) were treated with topical steroids. High-dose steroids were prescribed in 22 (11%) cases, regular-dose in 88 (46%), and low-dose in 82 (43%). The median time until the implementation of steroid use was 4 days (IQR 3-7). Patients prescribed with topical steroids had significantly longer healing times than the "no steroid" group (11 vs 6.5, P < 0.001). Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis and topical steroid use had worse clinical outcomes, with a higher proportion having longer healing times (P = 0.04) and corneal scarring (P = 0.02). Adjuvant topical steroid therapy did not affect visual acuity, patient outcomes or the rate of adverse effects but may delay epithelial healing in bacterial keratitis in these patients. Topical steroids may have a differential effect depending on the specific causative organisms; however, a clinical trial is needed to assess this. Adjuvant topical steroid therapy did not affect visual acuity, patient outcomes or the rate of adverse effects but may delay epithelial healing in bacterial keratitis in these patients. Topical steroids may have a differential effect depending on the specific causative organisms; however, a clinical trial is needed to assess this. The aim of this consensus article was to provide comprehensive recommendations in the management of diabetic macular edema (DME) by reviewing recent clinical evidence. A questionnaire containing 47 questions was developed which encompassed clinical scenarios such as treatment response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and steroid, treatment side effects, as well as cost and compliance/reimbursement in the management of DME using a Dephi questionnaire as guide. An expert panel of 12 retinal specialists from Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, India and Vietnam responded to this questionnaire on two separate occasions. The first round responses were compiled, analyzed and discussed in a round table discussion where a consensus was sought through voting. Consensus was considered achieved, when 9 of the 12 panellists (75%) agreed on a recommendation. The DME patients were initially profiled based on their response to treatment, and the terms target response, adequate response, nonresponse, and inadure rise, and recommendations for cataract development. Conventional creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) equations have been reported to overestimate renal function in patients with cirrhosis. The Royal Free Hospital (RFH) cirrhosis GFR equation was developed to accurately estimate GFR in this population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of widely available equations [Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations (MDRD-4, MDRD-6)] and the RFH equation to correctly estimate the GFR of patients with cirrhosis. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with cirrhosis who underwent measurement of GFR with the use of Cr-EDTA (GFR-M). The CKD-EPI, MDRD-4, MDRD-6 and RFH equations were calculated, while bias, precision and accuracy were estimated for each one of them and then compared with paired t-tests. Bias was defined as the mean difference between the GFR-M and the result of each equation; precision was defined as the SD of the differences and accuracy was defined as the square root of the mean squared error (mean of the squared differences). Higher values are associated with worse bias and better precision/accuracy. One-hundred and thirty-four cirrhotic patients were included. Bias was estimated for CKD-EPI, MDRD-4, MDRD-6 and RFH at -5.91, -3.13, 0.92 and 18.24, respectively. Significant differences were observed between all equations (P < 0.001). Regarding precision, only the comparison between MDRD-4 (20.81) and RFH (16.6) yielded a statistically significant result (P = 0.037). Finally, CKD-EPI (19.32) and MDRD-6 (18.81) exhibited better accuracy than GFR-RFH (24.61) (P = 0.006 and 0.001). RFH demonstrates inferior accuracy in predicting renal function in patients with cirrhosis, in comparison to conventional equations. RFH demonstrates inferior accuracy in predicting renal function in patients with cirrhosis, in comparison to conventional equations. Grazoprevir/elbasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) are the two preferred treatment options for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 mL/min. Both therapies have been separately analyzed in different real-life cohorts; however, a direct comparison has not been performed so far. We, therefore, analyzed safety and effectiveness of both regimens in a concerted real-life population. The Germany Hepatitis C-Registry is a prospective national real-world registry. The analysis is based on 2773 patients with documented GFR at baseline treated with grazoprevir/elbasvir (N = 1041), grazoprevir/elbasvir + ribavirin (N = 53) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (N = 1679). A total of 93 patients with GFR <30 mL/min were treated with grazoprevir/elbasvir (N = 56), grazoprevir/elbasvir + ribavirin (N = 4), and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (N = 33). They suffered significantly more frequent from diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary heart disease than individuals with GFR >30 mL/min and showed the following baseline characteristics 20.