PURPOSE Dismissal of families who refuse mandated childhood vaccines from pediatric practices has become more common among US pediatricians over the past 2 decades. While nurses (registered nurses [RNs] and advanced practice registered nurses [APRNs]) often are the first health-care professional to encounter parents' vaccine hesitancy and serve as a primary source of information, there are no published data on nurses' perspectives on dismissal as a response to vaccine refusal. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/2-2-2-tribromoethanol.html This study examined nurses' perspectives on dismissal of vaccine-refusing families from primary care practices. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey administered electronically from February to September 2018. Data analysis was conducted from November 2018 to March 2019. SETTING Data were collected electronically from a national sample of nurses. SUBJECTS A convenience sample of 488 primary care nurses (74% APRNs) was recruited and enrolled in the study through collaboration with 4 professional nursing associations. MEASURE AND ANALYSIS A cros some but not all. CONCLUSION Almost all nurses working in primary care encounter vaccine refusal, and most consider all Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended childhood vaccines to be important to public health. There is significant polarization of nurses' attitudes toward the appropriateness of dismissal as a response to vaccine refusal. We recommend the development of professional nursing guidelines for responding to vaccine refusal. However, because there are no data on the community health impact of dismissal policies, we recommend further research on outcomes of dismissal policies to inform such guidelines.PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of a Social Branding intervention in bars and nightclubs on smoking behavior. DESIGN Quasi-experimental controlled study. SETTING Bars and nightclubs in San Diego and San Francisco (intervention) and Los Angeles (control). PARTICIPANTS "Hipster" young adults (age 18-26) attending bars and nightclubs. INTERVENTION Anti-tobacco messages delivered through monthly anti-tobacco music/social events, opinion leaders, original art, direct mail, promotional activities, and online media. MEASURES A total of 7240 surveys were collected in 3 cities using randomized time location sampling at baseline (2012-2013) and follow-up (2015-2016); data were analyzed in 2018. The primary outcome was current smoking. ANALYSIS Multivariable logistic regression assessed correlates of smoking, adjusting for covariates including electronic cigarette use; differences between cities were evaluated using location-by-time interactions. RESULTS Smoking in San Francisco decreased at a significantly faster rate (51.1%-44.1%) than Los Angeles (45.2%-44.5%) (P = .034). Smoking in San Diego (mean 39.6%) was significantly lower than Los Angeles (44.8%, P less then .001) at both time points with no difference in rate of change. Brand recall was not associated with smoking behavior, but recall was associated with anti-tobacco attitudes that were associated with smoking. CONCLUSION This is the first controlled study of Social Branding interventions. Intervention implementation was accompanied by decreases in smoking (San Francisco) and sustained lower smoking (San Diego) among young adult bar patrons over 3 years.Recently, several high-profile randomized clinical trials conducted with employees at the University of Illinois and BJ's Wholesale Club have questioned the value of workplace health and well-being programs. This commentary focuses on the latest research published in The Quarterly Journal of Economics by authors Jones, Molitor, and Reif who evaluated the iThrive wellness program. The commentary challenges the study's main finding that wellness programs (in general) do not work. Several perspectives are explored including whether the evaluated programs are well-designed, sufficiently potent, and appropriate candidates for randomized trials. The article also asks what role employers can or should play in improving the health and well-being of Americans given recent troubling statistics showing a decline in life expectancy and an increase in health risks.PURPOSE To determine characteristics of weight gain prevention programs that facilitate engagement. DESIGN Randomized factorial experiment (5 × 2). SETTING Recruited nationally online. PARTICIPANTS Adults aged 18 to 75 with body mass index ≥25 who decline a behavioral weight loss intervention (n = 498). MEASURES Participants were randomly presented with one of 10 possible descriptions of hypothetical, free weight gain prevention programs that were all low dose and technology-based but differed in regard to 5 behavior change targets (self-weighing only; diet only; physical activity only; combined diet, physical activity, and self-weighing; or choice between diet, physical activity, and self-weighing targets) crossed with 2 financial incentive conditions (presence or absence of incentives for self-monitoring). Participants reported willingness to join the programs, perceived program effectiveness, and reasons for declining enrollment. ANALYSIS Logistic regression and linear regression to test effects of program characteristics offered on willingness to initiate programs and programs' perceived effectiveness, respectively. Content analyses for open-ended text responses. RESULTS Participants offered the self-weighing-only programs were more willing to initiate than those offered the programs targeting all 3 behaviors combined (50% vs 36%; odds ratio [OR] = 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-3.13). Participants offered the programs with financial incentives were more willing to initiate (50% vs 33%; OR = 2.08; 95% CI, 1.44-2.99) and anticipated greater intervention effectiveness (β = .34, P = .02) than those offered no financial incentives. Reasons for declining to initiate included specific program features, behavior targets, social aspects, and benefits. CONCLUSION Targeting self-weighing and providing financial incentives for self-monitoring may result in greater uptake of weight gain prevention programs. STUDY PREREGISTRATION https//osf.io/b9zfh , June 19, 2018.
PURPOSE Dismissal of families who refuse mandated childhood vaccines from pediatric practices has become more common among US pediatricians over the past 2 decades. While nurses (registered nurses [RNs] and advanced practice registered nurses [APRNs]) often are the first health-care professional to encounter parents' vaccine hesitancy and serve as a primary source of information, there are no published data on nurses' perspectives on dismissal as a response to vaccine refusal. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/2-2-2-tribromoethanol.html This study examined nurses' perspectives on dismissal of vaccine-refusing families from primary care practices. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey administered electronically from February to September 2018. Data analysis was conducted from November 2018 to March 2019. SETTING Data were collected electronically from a national sample of nurses. SUBJECTS A convenience sample of 488 primary care nurses (74% APRNs) was recruited and enrolled in the study through collaboration with 4 professional nursing associations. MEASURE AND ANALYSIS A cros some but not all. CONCLUSION Almost all nurses working in primary care encounter vaccine refusal, and most consider all Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended childhood vaccines to be important to public health. There is significant polarization of nurses' attitudes toward the appropriateness of dismissal as a response to vaccine refusal. We recommend the development of professional nursing guidelines for responding to vaccine refusal. However, because there are no data on the community health impact of dismissal policies, we recommend further research on outcomes of dismissal policies to inform such guidelines.PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of a Social Branding intervention in bars and nightclubs on smoking behavior. DESIGN Quasi-experimental controlled study. SETTING Bars and nightclubs in San Diego and San Francisco (intervention) and Los Angeles (control). PARTICIPANTS "Hipster" young adults (age 18-26) attending bars and nightclubs. INTERVENTION Anti-tobacco messages delivered through monthly anti-tobacco music/social events, opinion leaders, original art, direct mail, promotional activities, and online media. MEASURES A total of 7240 surveys were collected in 3 cities using randomized time location sampling at baseline (2012-2013) and follow-up (2015-2016); data were analyzed in 2018. The primary outcome was current smoking. ANALYSIS Multivariable logistic regression assessed correlates of smoking, adjusting for covariates including electronic cigarette use; differences between cities were evaluated using location-by-time interactions. RESULTS Smoking in San Francisco decreased at a significantly faster rate (51.1%-44.1%) than Los Angeles (45.2%-44.5%) (P = .034). Smoking in San Diego (mean 39.6%) was significantly lower than Los Angeles (44.8%, P less then .001) at both time points with no difference in rate of change. Brand recall was not associated with smoking behavior, but recall was associated with anti-tobacco attitudes that were associated with smoking. CONCLUSION This is the first controlled study of Social Branding interventions. Intervention implementation was accompanied by decreases in smoking (San Francisco) and sustained lower smoking (San Diego) among young adult bar patrons over 3 years.Recently, several high-profile randomized clinical trials conducted with employees at the University of Illinois and BJ's Wholesale Club have questioned the value of workplace health and well-being programs. This commentary focuses on the latest research published in The Quarterly Journal of Economics by authors Jones, Molitor, and Reif who evaluated the iThrive wellness program. The commentary challenges the study's main finding that wellness programs (in general) do not work. Several perspectives are explored including whether the evaluated programs are well-designed, sufficiently potent, and appropriate candidates for randomized trials. The article also asks what role employers can or should play in improving the health and well-being of Americans given recent troubling statistics showing a decline in life expectancy and an increase in health risks.PURPOSE To determine characteristics of weight gain prevention programs that facilitate engagement. DESIGN Randomized factorial experiment (5 × 2). SETTING Recruited nationally online. PARTICIPANTS Adults aged 18 to 75 with body mass index ≥25 who decline a behavioral weight loss intervention (n = 498). MEASURES Participants were randomly presented with one of 10 possible descriptions of hypothetical, free weight gain prevention programs that were all low dose and technology-based but differed in regard to 5 behavior change targets (self-weighing only; diet only; physical activity only; combined diet, physical activity, and self-weighing; or choice between diet, physical activity, and self-weighing targets) crossed with 2 financial incentive conditions (presence or absence of incentives for self-monitoring). Participants reported willingness to join the programs, perceived program effectiveness, and reasons for declining enrollment. ANALYSIS Logistic regression and linear regression to test effects of program characteristics offered on willingness to initiate programs and programs' perceived effectiveness, respectively. Content analyses for open-ended text responses. RESULTS Participants offered the self-weighing-only programs were more willing to initiate than those offered the programs targeting all 3 behaviors combined (50% vs 36%; odds ratio [OR] = 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-3.13). Participants offered the programs with financial incentives were more willing to initiate (50% vs 33%; OR = 2.08; 95% CI, 1.44-2.99) and anticipated greater intervention effectiveness (β = .34, P = .02) than those offered no financial incentives. Reasons for declining to initiate included specific program features, behavior targets, social aspects, and benefits. CONCLUSION Targeting self-weighing and providing financial incentives for self-monitoring may result in greater uptake of weight gain prevention programs. STUDY PREREGISTRATION https//osf.io/b9zfh , June 19, 2018.
0 Comentários
0 Compartilhamentos
5 Visualizações
0 Anterior
