Miscellaneous incidental findings were noted as free text. RESULTS The LVV was increased in 24.7% of VP/VLBW individuals and significantly larger than in FT controls. This was best identified by measurement of FOHR (AUC = 0.928). Ventricular enlargement was predicted by low gestational age (odds ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.98) and presence of neonatal intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.92). The numbers of deep and periventricular WML were increased while subcortical WMLs were not. CONCLUSION Enlargement of the LVV and deep and periventricular WMLs are typical sequelae of premature birth that can be appreciated on routine brain MRI. To increase sensitivity of abnormal LVV detection, measurement of FOHR seems feasible in clinical practice.OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare reliability of lower extremity imaging measurements using EOS and conventional X-ray (CR) of adult patients with mechanical axis malalignment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten patients (20 lower limbs) of mean age of 31.6 years (range 21-39) with post-traumatic deformities who presented for evaluation of osteotomies and/or ligament and cartilage reconstructions were prospectively enrolled. Two independent observers performed full-length anterior-posterior (AP) measurements 2 weeks apart on both CXR and two-dimensional (2D) EOS images. Measurements included weight-bearing axis (WBA), varus/valgus angle (V/V), femoral length (FL), tibial length (TL), femoral mechanical axis (FMA), tibial mechanical axis (TMA), and total limb length (TLL). Reliability was determined with random effects modeling of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) set to consistency. Three statistical operations were performed to compare interrater validity in CXR and EOS students' two-sample t test, paired two-sample t test, and Pearson's correlative r-statistical agreement. RESULTS There was a statistically significant difference for V/V, FL, and TLL (all p  less then  0.01) between CXR and EOS. A relatively large proportion of the population consistently had larger V/V measures for EOS compared to CXR. In contrast, the FL and TLL measures were consistently larger for CXR compared to EOS. The differences between CXR and EOS measurements were statistically significant, though the small differences in values were not clinically meaningful. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/didox.html Agreement of all measures remained high (r = 0.84-0.99). CONCLUSION Using 2D EOS for lower extremity measurements is reproducible, reliable, and comparable to the gold standard, standing long leg radiographs.OBJECTIVES Extra-articular posteromedial talocalcaneal coalition (EA-PM TCC) accounts for approximately one-third of TCC, but its radiographic features are not well-described. The current study aims to compare the radiographic features of EA-PM TCC with normal ankles and with the commoner forms of TCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of cases of TCC over 12 years for whom radiographs, CT, and/or MRI study were available. Radiographs were assessed by 2 radiologists for the presence of the C-sign, talar beak, dysmorphic sustentaculum, absent middle facet, and prominence of the posterior subtalar joint. TCC was classified by a third radiologist based on CT/MRI findings into 3 groups no TCC, EA-PM TCC, and other TCCs. The radiographic findings for the 3 groups were compared. RESULTS The study included 50 patients, 28 males and 22 females with a mean age of 21.1 years (range 8-70 years). In 15 patients, both ankles had been imaged, resulting in a total of 65 cases. In 17 ankles, no TCC was identified, while 15 ankles were classified as EA-PM TCC and 33 as having other types of TCC. There were no statistically significant differentiating radiological features between the groups with no TCC and EA-PM TCC apart from prominence of the posterior subtalar joint, while only the C-sign allowed identification of patients with other types of TCC. CONCLUSIONS The study suggests that EA-PM TCC cannot be diagnosed based on the classical indirect radiological signs of TCC, but can be identified by prominence of the posterior subtalar joint.INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS The objective was to describe the behaviour of the bladder neck and proximal urethra during urine leaking in the cough stress test (CST) in supine and standing positions using transperineal ultrasound (TPUS). METHOD We carried out prospective data collection and a retrospective data analysis of 102 women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) who had a positive CST with TPUS in the supine and/or standing position. On TPUS, the behaviour of the bladder neck and proximal urethra was described by the urethral length, urethral funnelling, bladder neck descent (BND), retrovesical angle (RVA) and urethral rotation angle (URA). Differences between the ultrasound findings in the two positions were evaluated. RESULTS In the 102 women, the mean age was 48 years and mean BMI was 23.8 kg/m2. On TPUS, urine leakage was detected in the supine or standing position in 102 women and in both positions in 81. Between the two positions, significant differences were found in the URA and RVA. In the standing position, the median RVA of 166° was significantly larger than that of 133° in the supine position (p  less then  0.001), and the median URA of 35° was significantly smaller than that of 64° in the supine position (p  less then  0.001). CONCLUSIONS TPUS in both positions can be used to detect the real-time behaviour of the bladder neck and urethra in the CST. In the standing position, less rotation and more straightening of the bladder neck and proximal urethra occurred during urine leakage.BACKGROUND Liver metastases represent the most common secondary malignant liver disease. Data regarding the incidence of colorectal and non-colorectal liver metastases are rare due to insufficient documentation in a register. Results regarding neoadjuvant therapy are limited and mostly from retrospective analyses. OBJECTIVE A summary and rating of the rationale for neoadjuvant therapeutic concepts for colorectal and non-colorectal liver metastases were performed. MATERIAL UND METHODS The analysis was based on European and American guidelines and included publications in both German and English languages. The results and recommendations were summarized and a review based on the literature is given. RESULTS Neoadjuvant treatment of liver metastases is performed with heterogeneous intentions. The selection of biologically favorable tumors as well as the conversion of primarily non-operable into resectable metastases of the liver are classical reasons for neoadjuvant treatment. The rationale for neoadjuvant treatment of colorectal and especially for non-colorectal liver metastases cannot be answered in a consistently coherent way with respect to the current status quo of the literature and guidelines.