4 small interference RNA reduced cell proliferation compared with miR-520h inhibitors alone (1.31±0.04 vs 1.55±0.04, P=0.013). Conclusions The regulatory loop NORAD/miR-520h/TLR4 promotes the proliferative ability and inhibits apoptosis in glomerular mesangial cells induced by high glucose.Objective To explore the effects and mechanisms of Xuezhikang on preventing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in diabetic rats. Methods Streptozotocin (65 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally to establish a diabetes model in 7-week-old male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. After 4 weeks of modeling, 24 diabetic rats were randomly divided into 4 groups sham group, CIN group, CIN+vehicle (Veh) group and Xuezhikang group. All animals were sacrificed at 24 hours after administration of contrast. Blood and kidney tissues were collected to detect biochemical, inflammation-related, oxidative stress-related and pathological indicators. Results After administration of contrast agent, the renal function-related indicators were decreased in Xuezhikang group compared with CIN+Veh group [serum creatinine (SCr) (59.3±3.3) μmol/L vs (73.2±4.1) μmol/L; blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (13.8±0.5) mmol/L vs (16.3±0.6) mmol/L; serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (sNGAL) (41.4±2.0) ng/ml vs (54.9±4.4) ng/ml; urinary kidney injury moleculer-1 (uKIM-1) (11.1±0.5) ng/ml vs (16.6±0.5) ng/ml] (all P less then 0.05). Histological analysis showed that the severity of renal tubule dilatation, brush border loss and renal tubular cell necrosis in Xuezhikang group was better than that of CIN+Veh group. Additionally, the oxidative stress-related indicators of Xuezhikang group improved compared with those of CIN+Veh group [malondialdehyde (MDA) (12.1±0.7) nmol/mg vs (15.5±0.8) nmol/mg, superoxide dismutase (***) (35.0±2.2) U/mg vs (23.7±3.4) U/mg, renal nitrite (1.7±0.1) nmol/mg vs (1.2±0.1) nmol/mg, all P less then 0.05]. Meanwhile, Xuezhikang pretreatment downregulated the mRNA and protein expression of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) (both P less then 0.05). Conclusion The current study suggests that Xuezhikang protects against CIN in diabetic rats by inhibiting oxidative stress and inflammation.Objective To explore the relationship between platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and cognitive impairment (CI) in diabetic patients treated with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). Methods The data of age, gender, underlying diseases, medication history, mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and biochemical indexes of diabetic MHD patients who were treated in 18 hemodialysis center in Guizhou Province between May and August 2019 were collected. According to whether they had CI or not, the patients were divided into CI group and control group, and the clinical characteristics between the two groups were compared. In addition, the patients were divided into four groups according to the quartile of PLR (PLR Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 group). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the relationship between PLR level and CI in diabetic MHD patients. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of PLR in detecting CI in diabetic MHD patients. Results Totally, 586 diabetic MHD patients (389 males) were included, with a mean age of (63±11) years. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PLR was associated with the risk of CI in diabetic MHD patients, and the risk of CI in PLR Q4 group was 3.022 times of that of PLR Q1 Group (95%CI 1.866-4.895, P less then 0.001). After adjusting for gender, age, dialysis age and education level, the risk of CI in PLR Q4 group was 2.529 times of that in PLR Q1 Group (95%CI 1.536-4.164, P less then 0.001). After further adjusting for hemoglobin, albumin, creatinine, leukocyte and blood glucose, the risk of CI in PLR Q4 group was 2.281 times of that in PLR Q1 group (95%CI 1.203-4.326, P=0.012). ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal threshold for PLR to predict CI in diabetic MHD patients was 155.3, with a sensitivity of 57.2% and a specificity of 60.8%, and the area under the curve was 0.608 (95%CI 0.561-0.644, P less then 0.001). Conclusion PLR is associated with CI in diabetic MHD patients.Pancreatic cancer has a high degree of malignancy, with a poor prognosis. Although surgical resection remains the only way to cure pancreatic cancer at present, the treatment mode has changed from "surgery priority" to "multidisciplinary cooperation" with the development of adjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy has been documented to increase the R0 resection rate of borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer and improve the prognosis of the patients, and there has been a consensus on neoadjuvant therapy for these patients. However, there is still **** controversy in the choice of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the status of radiotherapy, imaging and pathological evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer.Pancreatic cancer is considered to be the most malignant digestive tract tumor due to its high invasiveness, metastasis and recurrence rate. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/iacs-010759-iacs-10759.html In recent years, neoadjuvant therapy has brought new insights to the treatment of pancreatic cancer. To date, the value of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer has been widely recognized, but there is a lack of specific regimens. The superiority and inferiority of various regimens are still uncertain, therefore, the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy can be evaluated combined with imaging, functional and biological markers.Pancreatic cancer is one of the most malignant digestive tract tumors with a 5-year survival rate of less than 10%. Surgery remains the basis of long-term survival of pancreatic cancer patients. With the progress of chemotherapy, neoadjuvant therapy has been gradually carried out in pancreatic cancer. There are more and more studies on the effects of neoadjuvant therapy on perioperative complications of pancreatic cancer, but the results are not consistent. This article reviews the recent studies on neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer and analyzes the impact of some key factors on perioperative complications.
4 small interference RNA reduced cell proliferation compared with miR-520h inhibitors alone (1.31±0.04 vs 1.55±0.04, P=0.013). Conclusions The regulatory loop NORAD/miR-520h/TLR4 promotes the proliferative ability and inhibits apoptosis in glomerular mesangial cells induced by high glucose.Objective To explore the effects and mechanisms of Xuezhikang on preventing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in diabetic rats. Methods Streptozotocin (65 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally to establish a diabetes model in 7-week-old male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. After 4 weeks of modeling, 24 diabetic rats were randomly divided into 4 groups sham group, CIN group, CIN+vehicle (Veh) group and Xuezhikang group. All animals were sacrificed at 24 hours after administration of contrast. Blood and kidney tissues were collected to detect biochemical, inflammation-related, oxidative stress-related and pathological indicators. Results After administration of contrast agent, the renal function-related indicators were decreased in Xuezhikang group compared with CIN+Veh group [serum creatinine (SCr) (59.3±3.3) μmol/L vs (73.2±4.1) μmol/L; blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (13.8±0.5) mmol/L vs (16.3±0.6) mmol/L; serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (sNGAL) (41.4±2.0) ng/ml vs (54.9±4.4) ng/ml; urinary kidney injury moleculer-1 (uKIM-1) (11.1±0.5) ng/ml vs (16.6±0.5) ng/ml] (all P less then 0.05). Histological analysis showed that the severity of renal tubule dilatation, brush border loss and renal tubular cell necrosis in Xuezhikang group was better than that of CIN+Veh group. Additionally, the oxidative stress-related indicators of Xuezhikang group improved compared with those of CIN+Veh group [malondialdehyde (MDA) (12.1±0.7) nmol/mg vs (15.5±0.8) nmol/mg, superoxide dismutase (SOD) (35.0±2.2) U/mg vs (23.7±3.4) U/mg, renal nitrite (1.7±0.1) nmol/mg vs (1.2±0.1) nmol/mg, all P less then 0.05]. Meanwhile, Xuezhikang pretreatment downregulated the mRNA and protein expression of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) (both P less then 0.05). Conclusion The current study suggests that Xuezhikang protects against CIN in diabetic rats by inhibiting oxidative stress and inflammation.Objective To explore the relationship between platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and cognitive impairment (CI) in diabetic patients treated with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). Methods The data of age, gender, underlying diseases, medication history, mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and biochemical indexes of diabetic MHD patients who were treated in 18 hemodialysis center in Guizhou Province between May and August 2019 were collected. According to whether they had CI or not, the patients were divided into CI group and control group, and the clinical characteristics between the two groups were compared. In addition, the patients were divided into four groups according to the quartile of PLR (PLR Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 group). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the relationship between PLR level and CI in diabetic MHD patients. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of PLR in detecting CI in diabetic MHD patients. Results Totally, 586 diabetic MHD patients (389 males) were included, with a mean age of (63±11) years. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PLR was associated with the risk of CI in diabetic MHD patients, and the risk of CI in PLR Q4 group was 3.022 times of that of PLR Q1 Group (95%CI 1.866-4.895, P less then 0.001). After adjusting for gender, age, dialysis age and education level, the risk of CI in PLR Q4 group was 2.529 times of that in PLR Q1 Group (95%CI 1.536-4.164, P less then 0.001). After further adjusting for hemoglobin, albumin, creatinine, leukocyte and blood glucose, the risk of CI in PLR Q4 group was 2.281 times of that in PLR Q1 group (95%CI 1.203-4.326, P=0.012). ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal threshold for PLR to predict CI in diabetic MHD patients was 155.3, with a sensitivity of 57.2% and a specificity of 60.8%, and the area under the curve was 0.608 (95%CI 0.561-0.644, P less then 0.001). Conclusion PLR is associated with CI in diabetic MHD patients.Pancreatic cancer has a high degree of malignancy, with a poor prognosis. Although surgical resection remains the only way to cure pancreatic cancer at present, the treatment mode has changed from "surgery priority" to "multidisciplinary cooperation" with the development of adjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy has been documented to increase the R0 resection rate of borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer and improve the prognosis of the patients, and there has been a consensus on neoadjuvant therapy for these patients. However, there is still much controversy in the choice of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the status of radiotherapy, imaging and pathological evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer.Pancreatic cancer is considered to be the most malignant digestive tract tumor due to its high invasiveness, metastasis and recurrence rate. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/iacs-010759-iacs-10759.html In recent years, neoadjuvant therapy has brought new insights to the treatment of pancreatic cancer. To date, the value of neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer has been widely recognized, but there is a lack of specific regimens. The superiority and inferiority of various regimens are still uncertain, therefore, the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy can be evaluated combined with imaging, functional and biological markers.Pancreatic cancer is one of the most malignant digestive tract tumors with a 5-year survival rate of less than 10%. Surgery remains the basis of long-term survival of pancreatic cancer patients. With the progress of chemotherapy, neoadjuvant therapy has been gradually carried out in pancreatic cancer. There are more and more studies on the effects of neoadjuvant therapy on perioperative complications of pancreatic cancer, but the results are not consistent. This article reviews the recent studies on neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer and analyzes the impact of some key factors on perioperative complications.
0 التعليقات 0 المشاركات 38 مشاهدة 0 معاينة
إعلان مُمول