BACKGROUND Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis. The BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with ECD harboring a BRAF V600E mutation. Successful treatment has also been reported with MEK-targeted therapies, likely because of the fact that BRAF mutant-negative patients harbor MEK pathway alterations. In our Rare Tumor Clinic, we noted that these patients have frequent drug-related toxicity, consistent with previous reports indicating the need to markedly lower doses of interferon-alpha when that agent is used in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a review of ten patients with ECD seen at the Rare Tumor Clinic at University of California San Diego receiving 16 regimens of targeted BRAF, MEK, or combined therapies. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/H-89-dihydrochloride.html RESULTS The median age of the ten patients with ECD was 53 years (range, 29-77); seven were men. The median dose percentage (percent of FDA-approved dose) tolerated was 25% (range, 25%-50%). The most common clinically significant adverse effects resulting in dose adjustments of targeted therapies were rash, arthralgias, and uveitis. Renal toxicity and congestive heart failure were seen in one patient each. In spite of these issues, eight of ten patients (80%) achieved a partial remission on therapy. DISCUSSION Patients with ECD appear to require substantially reduced doses of BRAF and MEK inhibitors but are responsive to these lower doses. © 2019 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press.BACKGROUND Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) are a rare group of tumors that make up 2%-3% of pancreatic tumors. Recommended treatment for panNETs generally consists of resection for symptomatic or large asymptomatic tumors; however, optimal management for localized disease is still controversial, with conflicting recommendations in established guidelines. Our study aim is to compare surgical intervention versus active surveillance in nonmetastatic panNETs by size of primary tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 2,004 patients diagnosed with localized well-differentiated, nonfunctional panNETs (NF-panNETs) between 2004 and 2015. Patients' clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment modalities, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using frequency statistics, chi-square, and Kaplan-Meier curves. The objective of the study is to assess the outcome of surgical resection versus nonoperative management in patients with panNETs with different tumor sizes. RESULTS NF-panNETs. Data from the National Cancer Database were reviewed. This study's findings suggest that active surveillance is potentially a safe approach for NF-panNETs less then 1 cm. Larger tumors likely need active intervention. Independent prognostic factors include age at diagnosis, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, stage, tumor location, and surgical resection. These findings will help guide medical and surgical oncologists when formulating treatment plans for patients with small NF-panNETs. © AlphaMed Press 2019.Management of melanoma has been revolutionized by the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Immune system changes associated with aging may affect the efficacy of immune-based therapies. Using the National Cancer Database, we evaluated the impact of age on the receipt and efficacy of modern immunotherapies in patients with metastatic melanoma. We identified 11,944 patients from 2011-2015, of whom 25% received immunotherapy. Older (≥60 years), compared with younger, patients were less likely to receive immunotherapy (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.78; p less then .001). Immunotherapy was associated with a survival benefit in both younger and older patients ( less then 60 years hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.57-0.72; p less then .001; ≥60 years HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.50-0.60; p less then .001). Importantly, there was a statistically significant interaction between age and survival with immunotherapy, where a greater benefit was observed for older patients (pinteraction = 0.013). Further work studying the age-related response to immunotherapy is warranted. © AlphaMed Press 2019.Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T-cell therapy is becoming one of the most promising approaches in the treatment of cancer. On June 28, 2018, the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT) and the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency adopted a positive opinion, recommending the granting of a marketing authorization for the medicinal product Kymriah for pediatric and young adult patients up to 25 years of age with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) that is refractory, in relapse after transplant, or in second or later relapse and for adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after two or more lines of systemic therapy. Kymriah became one of the first European Union-approved CAR T therapies. The active substance of Kymriah is tisagenlecleucel, an autologous, immunocellular cancer therapy that involves reprogramming the patient's own T cells to identify and eliminate CD19-expressing cells. This is achieved by aCTICE Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T-cell therapy is becoming the most promising approach in cancer treatment, involving reprogramming the patient's own T cells with a CAR-encoding transgene to identify and eliminate cancer-specific surface antigen-expressing cells. On June 28, 2018, Kymriah became one of the first EMA approved CAR T therapies. CAR T technology seems highly promising for diseases with single genetic/protein alterations; however, for more complex diseases there will be challenges to target clonal variability within the tumor type or clonal evolution during disease progression. Products with a lesser toxicity profile or more risk-minimization tools are also anticipated. © AlphaMed Press 2019.BACKGROUND In the phase III MONARCH 2 study (NCT02107703), abemaciclib plus fulvestrant significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo plus fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). This study assessed patient-reported pain, global health-related quality of life (HRQoL), functioning, and symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS Abemaciclib or placebo (150 p.o. mg twice daily) plus fulvestrant (500 mg, per label) were randomly assigned (21). The modified Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form (mBPI-sf); European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QoL Core 30 (QLQ-C30); and Breast Cancer Questionnaire (QLQ-BR23) assessed outcomes. Data were collected at baseline, cycle 2, every two cycles 3-13, thereafter at every three cycles, and 30 days postdiscontinuation. Longitudinal mixed regression and Cox proportional hazards models assessed postbaseline change and time to sustained deterioration (TTSD) by study arm. RESULTS On-treatment HRQoL scores were consistently maintained from baseline and similar between arms.